Teams

NJ RED

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-15vs BRMST GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCorey Bagley / Carper Davis vs Thomas Quinn / Joel Walter7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRobert Hempelman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-08vs NJ SILVERSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRyan McLaughlin / Corey Bagley vs JoJo Brotamonte / David Lane6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRobert Hempelman / Brian Messer vs Paul Angelino / Tom Merkert6-4, 6-4
2025-06-24vs MEA BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesCorey Bagley / Ryan McLaughlin vs Randolph Dunbar / William Fry7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCarper Davis / Ernest Reece vs Bill Martin / Danny Wages7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2025-06-17vs LTA-Q BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesCarper Davis / Corey Bagley vs James Walker / Ronan Heaney3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-10vs BTA-F GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesCorey Bagley / Jason Bolton vs Niels Damrauer / John Koval6-3, 6-4
2025-06-03vs TTA GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarper Davis / Corey Bagley vs Kevin Darby / Gregory Anderson6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Corey Bagley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Robert Hempelman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Carper Davis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Gregg Occhiogrosso
published
3.19
Brian Messer
published 3.5
3.15
Rusty Jackson
published
3.11
Ernest Reece
published
Jason Bolton
published
Morey Walker
published
Steven Bartholomew
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carper Davis + Robert Hempelman6262% games+10.5% vs expected
Corey Bagley + Carper Davis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Corey Bagley
24W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
3.5
Robert Hempelman
75W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Carper Davis
46W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
Gregg Occhiogrosso
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Brian Messer
8W–15L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
Rusty Jackson
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Ernest Reece
36W–14L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Jason Bolton
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Morey Walker
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Steven Bartholomew
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.