Teams

2EAST-SPINA AD18&O 50M TH SEM

2023 SEM ADULT 18 & OVER NIGHT MEN · 5.0 MEN THURS PM SEM

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-08-01vs 4EAST-FOKA AD18&O 50M TH SEMWon 20
W#1 DoublesMatthew Prigorac / Peter Wagner vs Ryan Leslie / Ryan Stevens6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJohn Spina vs Peter Spina7-5, 6-3
L#1 DoublesMatthew Gargas / Eric Hendrickson vs David Atallah / Eric Podgorny4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJulian Olejnik vs Jason Joo4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEric Mojica / David Pietrangelo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesMatthew Prigorac / Peter Wagner vs Pablo Nunez / Cesar Escobar4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJose Benavente vs Alfonso Martinez Garcia0-6, 3-6
2023-06-15vs 4EAST-FOKA AD18&O 50M TH SEMLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Pietrangelo / Geoff Wagner vs Joe Steele / Ryan Stevens1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesPeter Wagner vs Nicholas Fiaschetti2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Spina / Eric Hendrickson vs Peter Spina / Ryan Leslie7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesTyler Gargas / Matthew Gargas vs Pablo Nunez / Cesar Escobar2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesPeter Wagner vs Jason Joo6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGeoff Wagner / David Pietrangelo vs David Atallah / David Pluszczyk3-6, 2-6
2023-06-05vs 4EAST-FOKA AD18&O 50M TH SEMLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Spina / Matthew Prigorac vs Derek Sammons / Nader Nassif3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJose Benavente vs Austin Huynh0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesEric Hendrickson / Julian Olejnik vs Peter Spina / Ryan Leslie6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-05-25vs 4EAST-FOKA AD18&O 50M TH SEMLost 12
W#1 DoublesMatthew Prigorac / John Spina vs Ryan Leslie / Peter Spina1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJulian Olejnik vs Nicholas Fiaschetti1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGeoff Wagner / Peter Wagner vs Ryan Stevens / Austin Huynh5-7, 5-7
L#1 DoublesMatthew Prigorac / Eric Hendrickson vs David Atallah / Pablo Nunez0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJulian Olejnik vs Alfonso Martinez Garcia3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGeoff Wagner / Peter Wagner vs Eric Podgorny / Robert Martin5-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 5.0 MEN THURS PM SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
14EAST-FOKA AD18&O 50M TH SEM6215920178
23PINE-inside-PODGORNY AD18&O 50M TH SEM5315922208
32EAST-SPINA AD18&O 50M TH SEM1761840270

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.54
John Spina
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
4.42
Matthew Prigorac
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
4.39
Julian Olejnik
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.38
David Pietrangelo
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.38
Peter Wagner
usually #2 Singles 27%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Eric Hendrickson
published 4.5
4.19
Matthew Gargas
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
3.95
Geoff Wagner
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Eric Mojica
published
Jose Benavente
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Sergio Vidal Lopez
published
Tyler Gargas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Spina + Matthew Prigorac13256% games+2.4% vs expected
Matthew Prigorac + Peter Wagner9359% games+1.4% vs expected
Geoff Wagner + Peter Wagner2447% games−5.1% vs expected
Matthew Prigorac + Julian Olejnik4162% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Prigorac + Eric Hendrickson2349% gamesnot enough data
Eric Mojica + David Pietrangelo134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Spina
76W–18L career · 6 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
4.54
Matthew Prigorac
126W–43L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Julian Olejnik
129W–48L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
4.39
4.5
David Pietrangelo
108W–73L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
4.38
Peter Wagner
54W–45L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
4.38
4.5
Eric Hendrickson
28W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Matthew Gargas
78W–41L career · 7 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Geoff Wagner
24W–24L career · 4 lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
3.95
Eric Mojica
46W–18L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jose Benavente
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sergio Vidal Lopez
10W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tyler Gargas
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.