Teams

Reilly/Miller

2021 40&Over Mixed · 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.10 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2021-08-05vs BuppLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrew Miller / Debra Go vs Michael Bupp / Nancy Ficarella2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Mosher / JIM MCDERMOTT vs Eugene Kobyakov / Mary Beth Fairchild6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAaron Huber / Traci Huber vs Manuel Castillo / Kathleen Alfano2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-07-28vs BuppWon 20
W#1 DoublesMAGGIE REILLY / Chris Mariano vs Nancy Ficarella / Michael Bupp2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTraci Huber / Aaron Huber vs Patrick Kelly / Andrea Sperry6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Reilly/Miller1133850

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Aaron Huber
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.13
Chris Mariano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.09
Virginia Crandall
published 4.5
4.04
Nathaniel Foster
published 4
3.95
MAGGIE REILLY
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.95
Kathleen Mosher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Traci Huber
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Beth McDermott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Andrew Miller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.27
Debra Go
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
JIM MCDERMOTT
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Go + Andrew Miller21266% games+19.5% vs expected
Nathaniel Foster + MAGGIE REILLY6166% games+13.7% vs expected
Aaron Huber + Traci Huber9358% games+5.3% vs expected
Beth McDermott + JIM MCDERMOTT6554% gamesnot enough data
Virginia Crandall + Nathaniel Foster5257% gamesnot enough data
Beth McDermott + Chris Mariano6167% gamesnot enough data
Debra Go + Nathaniel Foster314 matchesnot enough data
MAGGIE REILLY + JIM MCDERMOTT314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Aaron Huber
50W–30L career · 2 lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
4.13
4
Chris Mariano
57W–29L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%16%84%
4.13
4.5
Virginia Crandall
78W–73L career · no lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
4.09
4
Nathaniel Foster
115W–51L career · type A · no lines in 2021
<1%38%62%
4.04
4
MAGGIE REILLY
120W–77L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Kathleen Mosher
44W–54L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%66%34%
3.95
4
Traci Huber
62W–36L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Beth McDermott
134W–83L career · 2 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.66
4.5
Andrew Miller
110W–44L career · 1 line in 2021
>99%<1%<1%
3.58
3.5
Debra Go
147W–99L career · 6 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
JIM MCDERMOTT
58W–32L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.