Teams

Bupp

2021 40&Over Mixed · 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.80 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2021-08-05vs Reilly/MillerWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Bupp / Nancy Ficarella vs Andrew Miller / Debra Go2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEugene Kobyakov / Mary Beth Fairchild vs Kathleen Mosher / JIM MCDERMOTT7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesManuel Castillo / Kathleen Alfano vs Aaron Huber / Traci Huber6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2021-07-28vs Reilly/MillerLost 02
L#1 DoublesNancy Ficarella / Michael Bupp vs MAGGIE REILLY / Chris Mariano2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatrick Kelly / Andrea Sperry vs Traci Huber / Aaron Huber1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Nancy Ficarella
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Michael Bupp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Eugene Kobyakov
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Darren Stohr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Kathleen Alfano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Manuel Castillo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Carlos Ortiz
published 3.5
Adam Besch-Turner
published 3.5
Mary Beth Fairchild
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Patrick Kelly
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Beth Fairchild + Michael Bupp3350% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Ficarella + Michael Bupp224 matchesnot enough data
Mary Beth Fairchild + Carlos Ortiz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Ficarella
141W–94L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Michael Bupp
105W–88L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Eugene Kobyakov
92W–88L career · 1 line in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Darren Stohr
162W–191L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
Kathleen Alfano
38W–36L career · 1 line in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
Manuel Castillo
22W–34L career · 1 line in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.61
3.5
Carlos Ortiz
23W–35L career · no lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Adam Besch-Turner
18W–15L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary Beth Fairchild
28W–56L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Patrick Kelly
24W–36L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Sarah Taylor
32W–17L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.