Teams

FTA18S/Kroc/Welling

FTA SINGLES 18 & OVER - FTA Saturday · 4.0 Women Saturday

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-31vs FTA18S/HollyTree/BieberLost 02
L#1 SinglesKayla Varrie vs Michelle Sykes4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesEmily Welling vs Natalie Bieber2-6, 3-6
2025-10-18vs FTA18S/ButlerSprings/MatriccianiWon 30
W#1 SinglesSarah Joyce vs Greta Harper6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Huggins vs Jennifer Aikens6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKayla Varrie vs Christina Burnette6-3, 7-5
2025-10-07vs FTA18S/HollyTree/BieberWon 21
W#1 SinglesSarah Joyce vs Natalie Bieber6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKayla Varrie vs Amy Austin6-4, 6-3
L#3 SinglesEmily Welling vs Abbie Foster7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2025-10-04vs FTA18S/Spaulding Farm/MaddoxWon 30
W#1 SinglesVictoria Go vs Megan Christian6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesKayla Varrie vs Lauren McCallister6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesEmily Welling vs Nicole Nowicki6-0, 6-0
2025-09-13vs FTA18S/ButlerSprings/MatriccianiWon 30
W#1 SinglesSarah Joyce vs Greta Harper6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesEmily Welling vs Christine Cunningham3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 SinglesKayla Varrie vs Kimberly Pearigen7-5, 6-3
2025-09-06vs FTA18S/Spaulding Farm/MaddoxWon 21
W#1 SinglesSarah Joyce vs Kelly Clay6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesKayla Varrie vs Holly Smith7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesDemetra Karras vs Diana Otero-Santacana6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Elizabeth Huggins
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.73
Sarah Joyce
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.64
Kayla Varrie
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.55
Demetra Karras
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.46
Victoria Go
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.45
Sarah LaMunion
published
3.40
Emily Welling
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Demetra Karras + Sarah LaMunion123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Huggins
22W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.97
Sarah Joyce
13W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Kayla Varrie
11W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.64
4
Demetra Karras
6W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.55
Victoria Go
13W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.46
Sarah LaMunion
20W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
Emily Welling
45W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.