Teams

FTA18S/ButlerSprings/Matricciani

FTA SINGLES 18 & OVER - FTA Saturday · 4.0 Women Saturday

6 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-18vs FTA18S/Kroc/WellingLost 03
L#1 SinglesGreta Harper vs Sarah Joyce0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJennifer Aikens vs Elizabeth Huggins3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesChristina Burnette vs Kayla Varrie3-6, 5-7
2025-10-04vs FTA18S/HollyTree/BieberWon 21
W#1 SinglesJennifer Aikens vs Abbie Foster6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesChristina Burnette vs Melanie Greene6-1, 6-3
L#3 SinglesGreta Harper vs Amy Austin1-6, 2-6
2025-09-27vs FTA18S/Spaulding Farm/MaddoxSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJennifer Aikens vs Rebecca Maddox6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesCristina Koehler vs Diana Otero-Santacana3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-09-26vs FTA18S/Spaulding Farm/MaddoxWon 21
W#1 SinglesCristina Koehler vs Rebecca Maddox4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesGreta Harper vs Nicole Nowicki6-0, 6-1
L#3 SinglesChristina Burnette vs Megan Christian4-6, 3-6
2025-09-13vs FTA18S/Kroc/WellingLost 02
L#1 SinglesGreta Harper vs Sarah Joyce0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesKimberly Pearigen vs Kayla Varrie5-7, 3-6
2025-09-06vs FTA18S/HollyTree/BieberLost 03
L#1 SinglesGreta Harper vs Leslie Waltz6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJanet Matricciani vs Cali Rusk5-7, 2-6
L#3 SinglesKimberly Pearigen vs Melanie Greene2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Jennifer Aikens
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.77
Cristina Koehler
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.68
Christina Burnette
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.66
Janet Matricciani
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.37
Greta Harper
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.31
Kimberly Pearigen
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Matricciani + Christina Burnette134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Aikens
12W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.88
4
Cristina Koehler
45W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Christina Burnette
38W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
Janet Matricciani
27W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.66
3.5
Greta Harper
40W–54L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.37
Kimberly Pearigen
35W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.