Teams

Penn Pals (Shouldis)

2026 STL Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Combined

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ST. LOUIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-27vs BostickWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoseph Delsignore / Lori Divin vs Renea Harbert / David Lang6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesThomas Wheeland / Denise Foley vs Thomas Bostick / Angela Kammann6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesShashi Pathak / Wayne Bowman vs Adria Concannon / Richard Dickerson6-1, 6-4
2026-08-20vs BostickWon 21
L#1 DoublesShashi Pathak / Joseph Delsignore vs Tracey Tebbe / Todd Ingersoll3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJohn McGowan / Vickie Brandt vs Angela Kammann / Richard Dickerson6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJane Herder / Thomas Wheeland vs Briana Bostick / Thomas Bostick6-3, 6-2
2026-08-13vs BostickWon 20
W#1 DoublesSam Shouldis / Lori Divin vs Richard Dickerson / Renea Harbert6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHenrietta Buckley / David Buckley vs George Hendrix / Briana Bostick6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Combined
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Penn Pals (Shouldis)1021325
2Bostick0112421

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
David Buckley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Sam Shouldis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.73
Joseph Delsignore
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.63
Vickie Brandt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Jane Herder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Martina Augsburger
published
3.43
Jana Goeke
published
2.93
Nicholas Damato
published
2.76
Shashi Pathak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Lori Divin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Henrietta Buckley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
John McGowan
published
Thomas Wheeland
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Martina Augsburger + Sam Shouldis11158% games+14.6% vs expected
Jane Herder + Nicholas Damato5156% gamesnot enough data
Joseph Delsignore + Shashi Pathak1440% gamesnot enough data
Lori Divin + Sam Shouldis404 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Wheeland + Martina Augsburger303 matchesnot enough data
Vickie Brandt + Nicholas Damato213 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Delsignore + Martina Augsburger303 matchesnot enough data
Shashi Pathak + Sam Shouldis303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Buckley
14W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%15%
3.85
Sam Shouldis
191W–121L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Joseph Delsignore
209W–98L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Vickie Brandt
221W–113L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.63
Jane Herder
68W–74L career · 1 line in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
Martina Augsburger
241W–165L career · no lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
Jana Goeke
59W–78L career · no lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
3.43
Nicholas Damato
55W–45L career · no lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.93
Shashi Pathak
108W–75L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Lori Divin
68W–104L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Henrietta Buckley
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
John McGowan
67W–71L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Thomas Wheeland
17W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.