Teams

Bostick

2026 STL Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Combined

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ST. LOUIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-27vs Penn Pals (Shouldis)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRenea Harbert / David Lang vs Joseph Delsignore / Lori Divin0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Bostick / Angela Kammann vs Thomas Wheeland / Denise Foley1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAdria Concannon / Richard Dickerson vs Shashi Pathak / Wayne Bowman1-6, 4-6
2026-08-20vs Penn Pals (Shouldis)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesTracey Tebbe / Todd Ingersoll vs Shashi Pathak / Joseph Delsignore6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAngela Kammann / Richard Dickerson vs John McGowan / Vickie Brandt2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBriana Bostick / Thomas Bostick vs Jane Herder / Thomas Wheeland3-6, 2-6
2026-08-13vs Penn Pals (Shouldis)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRichard Dickerson / Renea Harbert vs Sam Shouldis / Lori Divin0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGeorge Hendrix / Briana Bostick vs Henrietta Buckley / David Buckley4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Combined
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Penn Pals (Shouldis)1021325
2Bostick0112421

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Todd Ingersoll
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
George Hendrix
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Richard Dickerson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Tracey Tebbe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Keith Nilsen
published
3.13
Elizabeth Lefton
published
2.97
Thomas Bostick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Renea Harbert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Briana Bostick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Adria Concannon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
David Lang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Angela Kammann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Briana Bostick + Thomas Bostick222052% games+4.1% vs expected
Angela Kammann + David Lang213 matchesnot enough data
Briana Bostick + Keith Nilsen033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Todd Ingersoll
71W–77L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
George Hendrix
73W–73L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
Richard Dickerson
27W–58L career · 3 lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
3.29
Tracey Tebbe
60W–51L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Keith Nilsen
51W–64L career · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.14
Elizabeth Lefton
77W–116L career · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
Thomas Bostick
104W–110L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Renea Harbert
69W–120L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Briana Bostick
115W–124L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Adria Concannon
10W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
David Lang
41W–86L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Angela Kammann
44W–97L career · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.