Teams

LOCH.Ju

2025 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-19vs BENT.WagnerLost 03
L#1 DoublesLauren Doyle / Ashley Hendricks vs Mary Jo Ford / Julie Wray6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPam Letts / Kimberly Shames vs Ana Santiago / Jacquelyn Raynor6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKatie Austin / Elizabeth Ju vs Jackie Obediente / Amanda Jeffries5-7, 4-6
2025-09-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Capetanos / Lauren Doyle vs Jenn Hartner / Megan Wagner7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-09-04vs MCP.HoWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin Cockayne / Lauren Doyle vs Leslie-Anne Ball / Bonnie Mulder7-6, 6-2
2025-08-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesErin Cockayne / Lisa Capetanos vs Christine Qubeck / Yuna Kim4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-08-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesErin Cockayne / Lisa Capetanos vs Lan Zhu / Maki Ishizaka6-0, 6-2
2025-08-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrea Finucane / Erin Cockayne vs Paula Laine / Christine Hutchens3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Lisa Capetanos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Erin Cockayne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.52
Amy Denton
published 2.5
2.46
Katie Austin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Lauren Doyle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Ashley Hendricks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.38
Kimberly Shames
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Andrea Finucane
published 2.5
2.29
Pam Letts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Ju
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Cockayne + Lisa Capetanos13755% games+7.6% vs expected
Andrea Finucane + Katie Austin213 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Finucane + Pam Letts033 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Shames + Ashley Hendricks303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lisa Capetanos
41W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
2.5
Erin Cockayne
50W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%11%89%
2.66
2.5
Amy Denton
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%45%55%
2.52
Katie Austin
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%62%38%
2.46
Lauren Doyle
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%67%33%
2.44
2.5
Ashley Hendricks
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%78%22%
2.40
Kimberly Shames
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%82%18%
2.38
2.5
Andrea Finucane
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.34
Pam Letts
6W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
0%95%5%
2.29
Elizabeth Ju
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.