Teams

MCP.Ho

2025 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLeslie-Anne Ball / Asuka Yamada vs Julie Wray / Megan Wagner4-6, 1-6
2025-09-04vs LOCH.JuLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeslie-Anne Ball / Bonnie Mulder vs Erin Cockayne / Lauren Doyle6-7, 2-6
2025-08-31vs BENT.WagnerLost 01
L#2 DoublesLeslie-Anne Ball / Lan Zhu vs Amy Alford / Jackie Obediente2-6, 3-6
2025-08-28Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLeslie-Anne Ball / Lan Zhu vs Mary Jo Ford / Julie Wray3-6, 1-6
2025-08-26vs LOCH.JuLost 01
L#3 DoublesLeslie-Anne Ball / Jennifer McGovern vs Linda Schmitt / Pam Letts3-6, 1-6
2025-08-21Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAsuka Yamada / Leslie-Anne Ball vs Julie Pedraza / Christine Hutchens5-7, 1-6
2025-07-31Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLeslie-Anne Ball / Rumiko Ho vs Julie Pedraza / Katherine Fehervari0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Tomoko Tomoyose
published
2.84
Asuka Yamada
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published 3
2.62
Jennie Yeung
published
2.53
Leslie-Anne Ball
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
2.46
Bonnie Mulder
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.45
Lan Zhu
published
2.43
Rumiko Ho
usually #3 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 2.5
2.42
Maki Ishizaka
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maki Ishizaka + Asuka Yamada6447% games−6.9% vs expected
Rumiko Ho + Maki Ishizaka0743% gamesnot enough data
Rumiko Ho + Asuka Yamada1633% gamesnot enough data
Bonnie Mulder + Rumiko Ho3255% gamesnot enough data
Bonnie Mulder + Maki Ishizaka1436% gamesnot enough data
Bonnie Mulder + Asuka Yamada404 matchesnot enough data
Maki Ishizaka + Tomoko Tomoyose314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tomoko Tomoyose
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.92
3
Asuka Yamada
36W–39L career · 11 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Jennie Yeung
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%20%80%
2.62
2.5
Leslie-Anne Ball
13W–35L career · type S · 7 lines in 2025
0%42%58%
2.53
2.5
Bonnie Mulder
39W–42L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%60%40%
2.46
Lan Zhu
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%64%36%
2.45
2.5
Rumiko Ho
33W–53L career · 13 lines in 2025
0%70%30%
2.43
2.5
Maki Ishizaka
34W–53L career · 13 lines in 2025
0%71%29%
2.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.