Teams

SD 4.5 Peninsula TC/ Latham

2023 SoCal Tri-Level Doubles WD Summer- SD · SD Women (4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.14 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#2 DoublesMary Lee Brendsel / Beth Timpe vs Izzy Lehne / Kerry Ott6-0, 2-6, 0-1
2023-08-18vs SD 4.5 Coronado Cays/ WebsterWon 10
W#1 DoublesJenna Boyhan / Kathleen Lacey vs Gladys Esponda / Alexia Palacios-Peters6-4, 6-0
2023-08-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesPriscilla Martinez / Kathleen Lacey vs Erin Wyatt / Makaylee Dahms6-2, 6-3
2023-08-11vs SD 4.5 UCRC/ RepettiLost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Gray / Pam Trent vs Angela Chang / KhanhLinh Nguyen1-6, 2-6
2023-07-28vs SD 4.5 Coronado Cays/ WebsterSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJenna Boyhan / Priscilla Martinez vs Narelle Pettee / Colleen Warren6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRegan Brown / Melissa Kroeger vs Gladys Esponda / Cristina Rassvetaieff6-7, 3-6
2023-07-21vs SD 4.5 UCRC/ RepettiSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJenna Boyhan / Priscilla Martinez vs Amy Repetti / Gina Sherer6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRegan Brown / Melissa Kroeger vs Tami Burns / MinhTam Flynn6-7, 3-6
W#1 DoublesJenna Boyhan / Priscilla Martinez vs Carol Smith / Makaylee Dahms6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKyle Balaban / Melissa Kroeger vs Sarina Lynn / Kerry Ott3-6, 3-6
2023-07-07vs SD 4.5 UCRC/ RepettiSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDarlene Gallego / Kathleen Lacey vs Sophia Richardson / Claudia Roehr6-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Kroeger / Beth Timpe vs Terri Bourne / Tami Burns2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-30vs SD 4.5 Coronado Cays/ WebsterLost 01
L#3 DoublesPatricia Brennan / Pam Trent vs Katerina Hart / Connie Kocherga3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD Women (4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.63
Jenna Boyhan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.58
Priscilla Martinez
published
4.20
Kathleen Lacey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.02
Brett Ridgway
published 4
3.85
Mary Lee Brendsel
published
3.81
Melissa Kroeger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Beth Timpe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
3.64
Kim Latham
published
3.60
Patricia HOLMAN
published
3.43
Patricia Brennan
published
3.24
Pam Trent
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Regan Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pam Trent + Patricia Brennan3249% games−5.7% vs expected
Melissa Kroeger + Beth Timpe7351% games−10.2% vs expected
Melissa Kroeger + Mary Lee Brendsel314 matchesnot enough data
Priscilla Martinez + Jenna Boyhan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Jenna Boyhan
70W–28L career · 4 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.63
Priscilla Martinez
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.58
4.5
Kathleen Lacey
59W–62L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
4.20
4
Brett Ridgway
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
4.02
Mary Lee Brendsel
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Melissa Kroeger
51W–60L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Beth Timpe
99W–76L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Samantha Polikowski
40W–71L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.75
Kim Latham
16W–10L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.64
Patricia HOLMAN
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.60
Patricia Brennan
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Pam Trent
53W–65L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.24
Regan Brown
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.