Teams

SD 4.5 UCRC/ Repetti

2023 SoCal Tri-Level Doubles WD Summer- SD · SD Women (4.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.23 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-08-25vs SD 4.5 Coronado Cays/ WebsterWon 10
W#3 DoublesAngela Chang / KhanhLinh Nguyen vs Sarah Kimball / Hayley Connors6-1, 6-2
L#1 DoublesAmy Repetti / Claudia Roehr vs Brittany Swenson / Makaylee Dahms2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTerri Bourne / Christine Golemb vs Ashley Jay / Izzy Lehne3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKhanhLinh Nguyen / Angela Chang vs Krista Losito / Carrie Musicant6-2, 6-4
2023-08-11vs SD 4.5 Peninsula TC/ LathamWon 10
W#3 DoublesAngela Chang / KhanhLinh Nguyen vs Lisa Gray / Pam Trent6-1, 6-2
2023-08-04vs SD 4.5 Coronado Cays/ WebsterSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNeda Mesri / Sophia Richardson vs Beth Mulcahy Elardo / Alexia Palacios-Peters2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTina Mertel / Angela Chang vs Hayley Connors / Jessica Cunningham4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 DoublesClaudia Roehr / Fiona Taylor vs Brittany Swenson / Linda Milburn4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTerri Bourne / Alexandra Dybvig vs Kerry Ott / Izzy Lehne3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTina Mertel / KhanhLinh Nguyen vs Sarah Schultzel / Carrie Musicant1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-07-21vs SD 4.5 Peninsula TC/ LathamWon 10
W#3 DoublesAngela Chang / KhanhLinh Nguyen vs Samantha Polikowski / Cathy Swindlehurst6-1, 6-0
2023-07-14vs SD 4.5 Coronado Cays/ WebsterSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNeda Mesri / Gina Sherer vs Jaimie Centeno / Vivian McAnally6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTerri Bourne / Christine Golemb vs Gladys Esponda / Cristina Rassvetaieff2-6, 6-7
2023-07-07vs SD 4.5 Peninsula TC/ LathamSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSophia Richardson / Claudia Roehr vs Darlene Gallego / Kathleen Lacey7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTerri Bourne / Tami Burns vs Melissa Kroeger / Beth Timpe6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesClaudia Roehr / Fiona Taylor vs Linda Milburn / Erin Wyatt6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTerri Bourne / Christine Golemb vs Ashley Jay / Sarina Lynn1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD Women (4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.91
Claudia Roehr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.35
Angela Chang
published 4.5
4.26
Fiona Taylor
published 4.5
4.22
Amy Repetti
published 4.5
4.12
Sophia Richardson
published
4.12
Adria Hilsdorf
published 4.5
4.07
Tami Burns
published
3.97
Neda Mesri
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.93
KhanhLinh Nguyen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Terri Bourne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Christine Golemb
published 4
3.72
MinhTam Flynn
published
3.30
Tina Mertel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Dee Dee Zielinski
published 3.5
3.22
Janet Costa
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sophia Richardson + Terri Bourne4649% games+10.8% vs expected
Neda Mesri + Fiona Taylor4161% games+8.0% vs expected
Neda Mesri + Adria Hilsdorf12952% games+3.8% vs expected
Sophia Richardson + Fiona Taylor3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Claudia Roehr
125W–33L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%76%23%
4.91
4.5
Angela Chang
14W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
4.35
4.5
Fiona Taylor
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
4.26
4.5
Amy Repetti
92W–38L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.22
Sophia Richardson
27W–31L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
4.12
4.5
Adria Hilsdorf
73W–54L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
4.12
Tami Burns
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
4.07
4.5
Neda Mesri
96W–82L career · 2 lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.97
4
KhanhLinh Nguyen
98W–42L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.93
4
Terri Bourne
105W–136L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.81
4
Christine Golemb
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
MinhTam Flynn
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
3.5
Tina Mertel
36W–29L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Dee Dee Zielinski
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Janet Costa
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.