Teams

GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Da Costa/EPTC#2

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

17 players · average NTRP 2.75 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Flight standings15 teams · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Delgado/Adult 18 & over/3.0W11152822304
2GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Baeza/EPCC#1111441639356
3GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Martinez/EPTC#3102421842423
4GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Bordier/EPTC#6102411946444
5GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Wilcox/TW#284322863528
6GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Alarcon/TW#175322862488
7GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Jabor/EPCC#275322866517
8GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Rangel/EPTC#575303069516
9GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Da Costa/EPTC#248273373550
10GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Payan/EPTC#748253575560
11GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Boss/EPTC#948174394618
12GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Arreola/EPTC#139223879574
13GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Dominguez/EPTC#839213982590
14GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Shepherd/FB111144697646
15GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Cardenas/CCC012184288589

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Diane Lunghi
usually #1 Doubles 68%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.67
Cristina da Costa
usually #2 Doubles 28%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published 3
2.49
Anayancy Roldan
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 2.5
2.11
Cecilia Delgado
usually #3 Doubles 59%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Esther McCarthy
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Esther Orona
usually #1 Doubles 77%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published
Eugenie Montague
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gloria King
usually #2 Doubles 34%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published
Jennifer Ibarra
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Kismet Sozer
usually #3 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Leticia Augsberger
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published
Patricia Moye Holderman
usually #2 Doubles 70%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Randi Cabrera
usually #2 Doubles 48%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Rosario Mendoza
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Sheby Parker
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Suleima Villa
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Yuri Caire
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kismet Sozer + Randi Cabrera7849% games+11.5% vs expected
Cristina da Costa + Rosario Mendoza5851% games+8.6% vs expected
Esther Orona + Diane Lunghi462059% games+1.0% vs expected
Cristina da Costa + Sheby Parker2639% games+0.4% vs expected
Randi Cabrera + Cristina da Costa6946% games−2.5% vs expected
Randi Cabrera + Patricia Moye Holderman3747% games−4.5% vs expected
Esther Orona + Gloria King11753% gamesnot enough data
Leticia Augsberger + Esther McCarthy6943% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Diane Lunghi
141W–95L career · 36 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Cristina da Costa
67W–91L career · 24 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
2.5
Anayancy Roldan
16W–14L career · 13 lines in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49
2.5
Cecilia Delgado
27W–43L career · 27 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Esther McCarthy
74W–87L career · 22 lines in 2026
not enough data
Esther Orona
123W–106L career · 39 lines in 2026
not enough data
Eugenie Montague
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Gloria King
100W–61L career · 61 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Ibarra
35W–42L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kismet Sozer
41W–54L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Leticia Augsberger
26W–61L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Moye Holderman
66W–59L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data
Randi Cabrera
54W–66L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rosario Mendoza
34W–41L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sheby Parker
54W–46L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Suleima Villa
21W–30L career · 32 lines in 2026
not enough data
Yuri Caire
52W–39L career · 32 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.