Teams

GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Jabor/EPCC#2

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP 2.90 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesCha Cha Schatzman / Karyna Vargas vs Michele Cicchetti / Rose Rivera3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Jabor / Cha Cha Schatzman vs Angie Stevenson / Magdlyn St-Cyr7-5, 6-2
2026-04-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCha Cha Schatzman / Cindy Miles vs Monica Valenzuela / Claudia Morones1-6, 0-6
2025-12-13Won 10
W#3 DoublesCha Cha Schatzman / Michelle Jabor vs Ida Santillan / Laura Akemi Aizawa1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-25Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBeatrice Heist / Cha Cha Schatzman vs Paola Gallegos / Paola Rojas Miranda1-6, 4-6
2025-08-27Won 10
W#3 DoublesCindy Miles / Cha Cha Schatzman vs Christina Mijares / Monica Ramirez3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Delgado/Adult 18 & over/3.0W11152822304
2GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Baeza/EPCC#1111441639356
3GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Martinez/EPTC#3102421842423
4GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Bordier/EPTC#6102411946444
5GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Wilcox/TW#284322863528
6GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Alarcon/TW#175322862488
7GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Jabor/EPCC#275322866517
8GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Rangel/EPTC#575303069516
9GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Da Costa/EPTC#248273373550
10GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Payan/EPTC#748253575560
11GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Boss/EPTC#948174394618
12GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Arreola/EPTC#139223879574
13GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Dominguez/EPTC#839213982590
14GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Shepherd/FB111144697646
15GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Cardenas/CCC012184288589

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Beka Levy
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.87
Diana Cardiel
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #1 Doubles 26% · published 3
2.84
Allene Mirazo
usually #2 Doubles 32%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published 3
2.79
Cathy Castro
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 41% · published 3
2.69
Amelie Baryla
usually #1 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 3
2.65
Ana Barrio
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 26% · published 3
2.60
Diana Calhoun
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published 3
2.31
Cindy Miles
usually #3 Doubles 69%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 2.5
2.27
Cha Cha Schatzman
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
2.17
Beatrice Heist
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Karyna Vargas
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Keithley Stanley
usually #1 Singles 27%, also #2 Singles 27% · published
Michelle Jabor
usually #3 Doubles 61%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Misty Duke
usually #2 Doubles 35%, also #1 Doubles 26% · published
Paige Fox
usually #2 Doubles 92%, also #1 Doubles 8% · published
Susan Daw
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Taryn Hunt
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Tiffany Joudi
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy Castro + Allene Mirazo6749% games+2.0% vs expected
Taryn Hunt + Michelle Jabor102640% games−1.7% vs expected
Allene Mirazo + Paige Fox4742% games−2.4% vs expected
Cindy Miles + Michelle Jabor3742% games−4.3% vs expected
Michelle Jabor + Diana Calhoun1640% games−5.9% vs expected
Michelle Jabor + Karyna Vargas7947% gamesnot enough data
Diana Calhoun + Susan Daw5947% gamesnot enough data
Misty Duke + Cathy Castro7555% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beka Levy
13W–5L career · 12 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
3
Diana Cardiel
36W–55L career · 29 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Allene Mirazo
66W–72L career · 32 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Cathy Castro
37W–63L career · 17 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Amelie Baryla
35W–27L career · 17 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Ana Barrio
19W–63L career · 18 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Diana Calhoun
47W–57L career · 26 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
2.60
2.5
Cindy Miles
21W–50L career · 13 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.31
2.5
Cha Cha Schatzman
18W–38L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Beatrice Heist
22W–22L career · 12 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Karyna Vargas
31W–34L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Keithley Stanley
49W–28L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Jabor
55W–79L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Misty Duke
27W–49L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data
Paige Fox
14W–35L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Daw
31W–30L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Taryn Hunt
36W–74L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tiffany Joudi
25W–15L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.