Teams

GEPTA-8.0-Adult/55+W(Morrow)(TW)

SouthernNewMexico · 2023 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 3.62 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2022-07-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRosa Alvarez / Christina Lanza vs Estela Loy / Ursula Morawietz4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2023 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Christina Lanza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.27
Becky Mowad
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Catherine Nicholson Parker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Chrissy Segaline
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jennifer Viramontes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Julieta Turner
published
Kelly Upson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Laura Orozco
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Lia Shelton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Linda Gomez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lucy Pfirman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Margaret Meyer
published
Patty Morrow
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Rosa Alvarez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tina Gute
published
Traci Hooker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Gomez + Lia Shelton4258% games+10.9% vs expected
Laura Orozco + Patty Morrow4352% games+9.4% vs expected
Tina Gute + Kelly Upson6648% games+4.0% vs expected
Tina Gute + Linda Gomez2447% games+3.5% vs expected
Tina Gute + Christina Lanza7554% games+2.2% vs expected
Margaret Meyer + Catherine Nicholson Parker5259% games+1.8% vs expected
Patty Morrow + Lia Shelton14657% games−3.8% vs expected
Laura Orozco + Becky Mowad0932% games−7.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Lanza
19W–22L career · 1 line in 2023
82%18%<1%
3.38
3.5
Becky Mowad
46W–64L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Catherine Nicholson Parker
15W–16L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Chrissy Segaline
21W–58L career · 1 line in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.09
Jennifer Viramontes
44W–39L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Julieta Turner
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kelly Upson
48W–42L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Orozco
52W–108L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lia Shelton
144W–91L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Linda Gomez
30W–41L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Lucy Pfirman
19W–23L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Margaret Meyer
52W–45L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patty Morrow
54W–41L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rosa Alvarez
11W–24L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Tina Gute
75W–62L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Traci Hooker
27W–32L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.