Teams

Lacewell

2025 Tri Level 55 and Above · Womens 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-02vs GR - StephensonLost 12
L#1 DoublesLynise Devance / Cynthia Jones vs Sherry Smith / Ina Jones6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJoan Faulkner / Anne Hungate vs Susan Johnson / Paige Temple2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesQUEEN HARGROVE / Bernadette David-Yerumo vs Lisa Thigpen / Debbie Stephenson6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2025-03-02vs Fun GirlsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDeb Lanier / Lisa Kempf vs Jean Herscovici / Susan Moore6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAdair Humphrey / Myra Peterson vs Luann Scruggs / Rachel Smith6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-03-01vs OPCHICSWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoan Faulkner / Lisa Kempf vs Debra Johann / Mariana Goldstein3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-03-01vs GR - StephensonWon 21
W#1 DoublesCynthia Jones / Lynise Devance vs Ina Jones / Sherry Smith6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoan Faulkner / Anne Hungate vs Paige Temple / Susan Johnson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesQUEEN HARGROVE / Bernadette David-Yerumo vs Lisa Thigpen / Pam Taylor6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-01vs Fun GirlsWon 21
W#1 DoublesLynise Devance / Laura Davidson vs Doreen Hyet / Lisa Zurawski6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAnne Hungate / Deb Lanier vs Jean Herscovici / Rachel Smith6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMyra Peterson / Adair Humphrey vs Susan Moore / Ann Game5-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Womens 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Lynise Devance
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Cynthia Jones
published 4
3.59
Deb Lanier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.51
Sheryletta Lacewell
published
3.38
Lisa Kempf
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Joan Faulkner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.82
Myra Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
QUEEN HARGROVE
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Shumena Horton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Kempf + Deb Lanier9561% games−1.9% vs expected
Myra Peterson + Lisa Kempf173046% games−4.2% vs expected
Lynise Devance + Sheryletta Lacewell5066% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lynise Devance
126W–71L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Cynthia Jones
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Deb Lanier
487W–223L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.59
Sheryletta Lacewell
14W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.51
3.5
Lisa Kempf
365W–300L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.38
3.5
Joan Faulkner
69W–72L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3
Myra Peterson
169W–141L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
QUEEN HARGROVE
107W–205L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Shumena Horton
17W–22L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.