Teams

WNCA Johnson (Aston)

Adult 18 & Over WNC USTA 2025 · 18 & O 3.5 men Wed evening

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-21vs WNCA Thompson (Brevard)Won 32
W#1 DoublesWinfield Brians / Brent Edelman vs Alfred Thompson / Charles LeGrand6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAthos Michaelides vs Mark Harmon6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTait Piercy / Kevin Spaeth vs Stanley Treece / Kenneth Lovett6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTanner Cheek vs Christian Prescott4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarter Wooten / Pai Charasika vs James Marx / Miles Demott3-6, 1-6
2025-05-03vs WNCT Shalloe (Crowne)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesKevin Spaeth / Benjamin Brock vs Mark Beno / Matt Roland6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesWinfield Brians vs William Krueger3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCarter Wooten / Pai Charasika vs Andrew Pardue / Breen OBrien3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & O 3.5 men Wed evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Athos Michaelides
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.44
Tait Piercy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Brent Edelman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Benjamin Brock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Andrew Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.28
Winfield Brians
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.22
Kevin Spaeth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Tanner Cheek
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.87
Carter Wooten
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Pai Charasika
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Benjamin Brock + Winfield Brians224 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Johnson + Brent Edelman224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Athos Michaelides
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
Tait Piercy
14W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Brent Edelman
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Benjamin Brock
16W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Andrew Johnson
28W–23L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.30
Winfield Brians
19W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
Kevin Spaeth
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
Tanner Cheek
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.21
3
Carter Wooten
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.87
Pai Charasika
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.