Teams

WNCT Shalloe (Crowne)

Adult 18 & Over WNC USTA 2025 · 18 & O 3.5 men Wed evening

11 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-21vs WNCF Mabunga (ARC S)Won 30
W#1 DoublesDave Kroondyk / Mark Beno vs Thomas Hostetler / Craig Nelson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesWilliam Krueger vs Drew Dawson6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMark Kiiss / Benjamin Gilmer vs Thomas Peaden / Francis Mabunga6-2, 7-5
2025-05-14vs WNCA Thompson (Brevard)Lost 23
L#1 DoublesChristopher van Camp / Matt Roland vs Christian Prescott / Glenn Handrahan5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesDave Kroondyk vs Kenneth Lovett4-1
L#2 DoublesTom Shalloe / Benjamin Gilmer vs Alfred Thompson / Charles LeGrand7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMark Beno vs Mark Harmon2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAndrew Pardue / Jordan Shields vs Clark Lovelace / Miles Demott6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-03vs WNCA Johnson (Aston)Won 21
L#1 DoublesMark Beno / Matt Roland vs Kevin Spaeth / Benjamin Brock1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesWilliam Krueger vs Winfield Brians6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAndrew Pardue / Breen OBrien vs Carter Wooten / Pai Charasika6-3, 6-1
2025-05-01vs WNCA Thompson (Brevard)Won 31
W#1 DoublesChristopher van Camp / Matt Roland vs James Marx / Kenneth Lovett6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDave Kroondyk vs Christian Prescott6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBreen OBrien / Mark Kiiss vs Clark Lovelace / Parker Platt6-5
L#2 SinglesMark Beno vs Mark Harmon2-6, 3-6
2025-04-30vs WNCF Mabunga (ARC S)Won 32
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Gilmer / Dave Kroondyk vs Craig Nelson / Steven Terranova6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesWilliam Krueger vs Thomas Hostetler6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTom Shalloe / Matt Roland vs Grant Griffin / Daniel Berchenko6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMark Beno vs Thomas Peaden1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAndrew Pardue / Mark Kiiss vs Zachary Flaming / Gregory Bondzeit6-1, 6-4
2025-04-23vs WNCA Thompson (Brevard)Lost 23
L#1 DoublesChristopher van Camp / Mark Beno vs Bradley Rising / Christian Prescott5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesDave Kroondyk vs Charles LeGrand6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJordan Shields / Benjamin Gilmer vs Stanley Treece / Glenn Handrahan1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesWilliam Krueger vs Mark Harmon6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAndrew Pardue / Mark Kiiss vs Clark Lovelace / James Marx3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-09vs WNCF Mabunga (ARC S)Won 41
W#1 DoublesMark Beno / Christopher van Camp vs Thomas Hostetler / Steven Terranova7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDave Kroondyk vs Thomas Peaden6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesTom Shalloe / Breen OBrien vs Zachary Flaming / Drew Dawson5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesWilliam Krueger vs Craig Nelson1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJordan Shields / Mark Kiiss vs Joshua Indenbaum / Francis Mabunga6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & O 3.5 men Wed evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Dave Kroondyk
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.43
Mark Kiiss
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.39
William Krueger
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.32
Breen OBrien
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Christopher van Camp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Tom Shalloe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Matt Roland
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Benjamin Gilmer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.64
Andrew Pardue
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Jordan Shields
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Beno
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Krueger + Dave Kroondyk8066% games+6.8% vs expected
Dave Kroondyk + Matt Roland213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dave Kroondyk
96W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.73
Mark Kiiss
12W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
William Krueger
25W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.39
3.5
Breen OBrien
20W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Christopher van Camp
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tom Shalloe
19W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.11
Matt Roland
30W–13L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.10
3
Benjamin Gilmer
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Andrew Pardue
19W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
Jordan Shields
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Beno
4W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.