Teams

Medel 18+ Tri 5.0/4.5/4.0W Sunday

2025 Piedmont Tri-Level 18 & Over · 5.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
L#1 DoublesJamie Breunig / Bety Miranda vs Madeline Brown / Gabrielle Wreder1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Buchanan / Sarah Stafford vs Denise Speight / Melissa Agner2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Mays / Chris Schermerhorn vs Sarah Dunning / Marla Barnwell2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesBety Miranda / Jamie Breunig vs Gabrielle Wreder / Rosa Tapia3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJane Owens / Alejandra Hernandez Medel vs Kate Meiners / Tiffany Brown6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.66
Jamie Breunig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.60
Bety Miranda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.44
4.13
Heidi Bradley
published 4.5
4.04
Jane Owens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Sheri Romaine
published
3.83
Sarah Groce
published
3.79
Alejandra Hernandez Medel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Chris Schermerhorn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
3.63
Jennifer Mays
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Laura Buchanan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Stafford
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adriana Hernandez + Alejandra Hernandez Medel3352% games−0.4% vs expected
Sarah Groce + Heidi Bradley4642% games−7.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Jamie Breunig
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
4.66
5
Bety Miranda
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.60
Tiffany Vanhpraseuth
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
4.44
4.5
Heidi Bradley
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
4.13
Jane Owens
13W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
4.04
Sheri Romaine
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.89
Sarah Groce
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.83
4
Alejandra Hernandez Medel
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Chris Schermerhorn
83W–43L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Adriana Hernandez
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
Jennifer Mays
70W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
Laura Buchanan
9W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Stafford
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.