Teams

LI Health & Racquet, Freeman

2021 18&Over Women Night · 2.5 Night

7 players · average NTRP 2.75 / LONG ISLAND REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesKaren Gomez / Linda Hyman vs Lori Rutkowski / Jenny Winn1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRandee Silberfeld vs Nancy Jannazzo6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMAUREEN FREEMAN / Sumalee Siegmund vs Mani Strazzera / Suzanne Wolfe7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2021-07-13vs LI Health & Racquet, Connolly/KayeLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren Gomez / Linda Hyman vs Marianne Krapf / Millie Chamberlain6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesRandee Silberfeld vs Maura Connolly5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMAUREEN FREEMAN / Amy Raupp vs Doreen Tufano / Sandra Picerno5-7, 2-6
2021-07-07vs Claytime, HoeffnerLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren Gomez / MAUREEN FREEMAN vs Marian Morris / Barbara Schmidt6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesAmy Raupp vs Alison Sannella6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGina Malone / Sumalee Siegmund vs Dana Taub / Melissa Abitbol0-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesKaren Gomez / Linda Hyman vs Lori Rutkowski / Suzanne Wolfe7-6, 4-5
L#1 SinglesSumalee Siegmund vs Nancy Jannazzo2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMarcia Montoya / Randee Silberfeld vs Sharon Rothstein / Jennifer Giannotti6-4, 6-4
W#1 DoublesLinda Hyman / Karen Gomez vs Marianne Krapf / Millie Chamberlain7-5, 7-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Raupp vs Maura Connolly3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMAUREEN FREEMAN / Marcia Montoya vs Patricia Cain / Sandra Picerno4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-06-09vs Claytime, HoeffnerLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren Gomez / Linda Hyman vs Patricia Hoeffner / Ellen Fogel2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAmy Raupp vs Alison Sannella4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMarcia Montoya / Gina Malone vs Marian Morris / Barbara Schmidt3-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesLinda Hyman / Karen Gomez vs Jenny Winn / Suzanne Wolfe3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAmy Raupp vs Amy Greenfield6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSumalee Siegmund / MAUREEN FREEMAN vs Victoria Roberto / Jennifer Giannotti6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2021-05-25vs LI Health & Racquet, Connolly/KayeLost 12
L#1 DoublesMAUREEN FREEMAN / Randee Silberfeld vs Maura Connolly / Millie Chamberlain2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAmy Raupp vs Sandra Picerno2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSumalee Siegmund / Gina Malone vs Mary Ann Mina / Barrie Madasu2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-05-18vs Claytime, HoeffnerWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Gomez / Linda Hyman vs Ellen Fogel / Michelle Loretto6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAmy Raupp vs Lisa Nathanson7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMAUREEN FREEMAN / Randee Silberfeld vs Marian Morris / Patricia Hoeffner4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5 Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1L.I. - Carefree, Strazzera/Rothstein09151229237
2LI Health & Racquet, Connolly/Kaye09141332261
3Claytime, Hoeffner09131433245
4LI Health & Racquet, Freeman09121536292

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Sumalee Siegmund
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.76
Randee Silberfeld
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.69
Karen Gomez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.56
Marcia Montoya
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
2.42
Gina Malone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.37
MAUREEN FREEMAN
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Amy Raupp
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcia Montoya + MAUREEN FREEMAN1734% games−5.8% vs expected
MAUREEN FREEMAN + Sumalee Siegmund4164% gamesnot enough data
MAUREEN FREEMAN + Randee Silberfeld1434% gamesnot enough data
Marcia Montoya + Randee Silberfeld314 matchesnot enough data
Marcia Montoya + Karen Gomez224 matchesnot enough data
MAUREEN FREEMAN + Karen Gomez224 matchesnot enough data
Sumalee Siegmund + Gina Malone224 matchesnot enough data
MAUREEN FREEMAN + Gina Malone033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sumalee Siegmund
21W–36L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
Randee Silberfeld
15W–17L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
2.76
Karen Gomez
42W–30L career · 12 lines in 2021
8%92%1%
2.69
Marcia Montoya
33W–80L career · 7 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
2.56
3
Gina Malone
8W–19L career · 3 lines in 2021
73%27%<1%
2.42
MAUREEN FREEMAN
38W–72L career · 12 lines in 2021
0%84%16%
2.37
2.5
Amy Raupp
7W–15L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.