Teams

Claytime, Hoeffner

2021 18&Over Women Night · 2.5 Night

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / LONG ISLAND REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-07-20vs LI Health & Racquet, Connolly/KayeLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatricia Hoeffner / Barbara Schmidt vs Jennifer Baldi / Karen Kaye2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMichelle Loretto vs Patricia Cain2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Abitbol / Dana Taub vs Barrie Madasu / Mary Ann Mina6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesLisa Nathanson / Dana Taub vs Lori Rutkowski / Jenny Winn3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAlison Sannella vs Nancy Jannazzo6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMelissa Abitbol / Ellen Fogel vs Mani Strazzera / Jennifer Giannotti6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-07-07vs LI Health & Racquet, FreemanWon 21
L#1 DoublesMarian Morris / Barbara Schmidt vs Karen Gomez / MAUREEN FREEMAN3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesAlison Sannella vs Amy Raupp7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDana Taub / Melissa Abitbol vs Gina Malone / Sumalee Siegmund6-0, 6-4
L#1 DoublesPatricia Hoeffner / Ellen Fogel vs Karen Kaye / Jennifer Baldi6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAlison Sannella vs Maura Connolly4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarian Morris / Lisa Nathanson vs Mary Locascio / Doreen Tufano6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesEllen Fogel / Dana Taub vs Mani Strazzera / Lori Rutkowski2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBarbara Schmidt vs Jackie Ram1-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Hoeffner / Marian Morris vs Suzanne Wolfe / Jennifer Giannotti4-6, 3-6
2021-06-09vs LI Health & Racquet, FreemanWon 21
L#1 DoublesPatricia Hoeffner / Ellen Fogel vs Karen Gomez / Linda Hyman6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAlison Sannella vs Amy Raupp6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMarian Morris / Barbara Schmidt vs Marcia Montoya / Gina Malone6-3, 6-2
2021-06-01vs LI Health & Racquet, Connolly/KayeLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarian Morris / Patricia Hoeffner vs Karen Kaye / Jennifer Baldi3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLisa Nathanson vs Maura Connolly2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Loretto / Dana Taub vs Mary Locascio / Barrie Madasu6-1, 6-1
L#1 DoublesBarbara Schmidt / Dana Taub vs Jenny Winn / Victoria Roberto1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAlison Sannella vs Lori Rutkowski6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEllen Fogel / Melissa Abitbol vs Suzanne Wolfe / Beth Limmer6-3, 6-3
2021-05-18vs LI Health & Racquet, FreemanLost 03
L#1 DoublesEllen Fogel / Michelle Loretto vs Karen Gomez / Linda Hyman4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLisa Nathanson vs Amy Raupp6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMarian Morris / Patricia Hoeffner vs MAUREEN FREEMAN / Randee Silberfeld6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5 Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1L.I. - Carefree, Strazzera/Rothstein09151229237
2LI Health & Racquet, Connolly/Kaye09141332261
3Claytime, Hoeffner09131433245
4LI Health & Racquet, Freeman09121536292

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.65
Ellen Fogel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Melissa Abitbol
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.32
Alison Sannella
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Dana Taub
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Barbara Schmidt
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Lisa Nathanson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Marian Morris
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Michelle Loretto
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Patricia Hoeffner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Loretto + Lisa Nathanson71443% games−3.9% vs expected
Ellen Fogel + Melissa Abitbol61242% games−6.4% vs expected
Marian Morris + Patricia Hoeffner01525% games−11.7% vs expected
Ellen Fogel + Patricia Hoeffner2353% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Schmidt + Patricia Hoeffner1432% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Nathanson + Patricia Hoeffner0535% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Loretto + Alison Sannella044 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Schmidt + Lisa Nathanson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ellen Fogel
25W–57L career · 6 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
2.65
Melissa Abitbol
9W–19L career · 4 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Alison Sannella
17W–71L career · 5 lines in 2021
91%9%<1%
2.32
2.5
Dana Taub
10W–13L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Barbara Schmidt
6W–24L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lisa Nathanson
15W–55L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Marian Morris
5W–40L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michelle Loretto
18W–44L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Patricia Hoeffner
5W–43L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.