Teams

NITA S 40W18d Salt Creek (Levin/Jones)

2023 NITA3 Summer Adult 18 & Over · NITA Summer Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

20 players · average NTRP 3.93 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-07-20vs NITA S 40W18e Score (Knutte)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesWendy Leto / Jennifer Peterson vs Lisa Rowen / Kelly Good1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSara Olson / Tripti Burt vs Mary Sullivan / Marion Zerfoss2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Mortimer / Michelle Yacullo vs Kerri Sedlacek / Ying Zhang3-6, 1-6
2023-07-19vs NITA S 40W18c TAM (Wright)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Phelps / Kristy Sweigard vs Terri Whiting / Kitty Swanson6-7, 4-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKatie Jones / Tripti Burt vs Martha Davis / Allison Goldberg3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNeena Will / Hilary Sefton vs Haina Shin / Ashley Boduch1-6, 5-7
2023-07-10vs NITA S 40W18e Score (Knutte)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesKaterina Hickey / Jennifer Peterson vs Kerri Sedlacek / Mary Sullivan4-6, 5-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Morrissey / Stephanie Mortimer vs Cindy Bielik / Marinne Leonard3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKatie Jones / Tripti Burt vs Carrie Driscoll / Jane Strien6-7, 1-4
2023-06-26vs NITA S 40W18a Norris (Saguto)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKaterina Hickey / Margaret Chung vs Renee Buxton / Suzanne Rich6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTripti Burt / Neena Will vs Valerie Nagel / Jackie Spicuzza2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJen Katsoulis / Michelle Yacullo vs Cheri Medus / Lori Saguto2-6, 0-6
2023-06-19vs NITA S 40W18b Rush Copley (Stine)Won 21
W#1 DoublesKaterina Hickey / Margaret Chung vs Martha Skryd / Teri Andersen6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNeena Will / Raydeen Neveril vs Allison Genovese / Sandy Peters7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAnn McCarthy / Hilary Sefton vs Sue Keough / Elena Kovalenko4-6, 5-7
2023-06-11vs NITA S 40W18c TAM (Wright)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesWendy Leto / Margaret Chung vs Stacey Cohen / Courtney Tornow4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKara Levin / Katerina Hickey vs Jennifer Langtry / Rebecca Daly4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHilary Sefton / Mary Morrissey vs Haina Shin / Allison Goldberg0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesKristy Sweigard / Jennifer Peterson vs Dawn Baumann / Kristine Jurczyk1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKaterina Hickey vs Ginger Riessen6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSara Olson / Katie Jones vs Anna Dau / Colleen Stover2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Yacullo / Stephanie Mortimer vs Leah Starkman / Jennifer Peck4-6, 4-6
2023-05-20vs NITA S 40W18a Norris (Saguto)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesWendy Leto / Julie Boruff vs MEREDITH BETTCHER / Angie Ulie6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAngela Lukas / Jennifer Peterson vs Vicki Mitchell / Margaret Logsdon1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSara Olson / Mary Morrissey vs Jackie Spicuzza / Valerie Nagel3-6, 3-6
2023-05-13vs NITA S 40W18b Rush Copley (Stine)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesRina Daw / Wendy Leto vs Dorothy OMalley / Tiffany Oken1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Boruff / Angela Lukas vs Teri Andersen / Sandy Peters6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSara Olson / Neena Will vs Rebecca Stine / Elena Kovalenko3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · NITA Summer Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA S 40W18c TAM (Wright)91301022234
2NITA S 40W18f Heritage (Jurczyk/Campanelli)72261023230
3NITA S 40W18e Score (Knutte)64271331293
4NITA S 40W18a Norris (Saguto)55182247353
5NITA S 40W18d Salt Creek (Levin/Jones)2792757386
6NITA S 40W18b Rush Copley (Stine)01063471447

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Kristy Sweigard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Sara Olson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.88
Wendy Garber
published
3.78
Julie Boruff
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Hilary Sefton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Tripti Burt
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.67
Wendy Leto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Katerina Hickey
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.53
Rina Daw
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Angela Lukas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.23
Michelle Yacullo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Phelps
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jeanna Cook
published
Jen Katsoulis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kara Levin
published
Margaret Chung
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Morrissey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Neena Will
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Raydeen Neveril
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Mortimer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Chung + Katerina Hickey4170% games+10.4% vs expected
Kristy Sweigard + Katerina Hickey10163% games+4.8% vs expected
Margaret Chung + Angela Lukas6457% games+2.8% vs expected
Tripti Burt + Neena Will2343% games+1.8% vs expected
Wendy Leto + Angela Lukas141353% games−3.7% vs expected
Katerina Hickey + Julie Boruff7457% games−4.2% vs expected
Wendy Leto + Margaret Chung3442% games−9.9% vs expected
Angela Lukas + Katerina Hickey2839% games−12.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kristy Sweigard
224W–142L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.92
Sara Olson
133W–62L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.89
Wendy Garber
128W–93L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.88
Julie Boruff
123W–83L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Hilary Sefton
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Tripti Burt
16W–25L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Wendy Leto
109W–80L career · 4 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Katerina Hickey
87W–101L career · 5 lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.66
Rina Daw
34W–35L career · 1 line in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Angela Lukas
106W–140L career · 2 lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
3.45
3.5
Michelle Yacullo
166W–110L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Elizabeth Phelps
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Jeanna Cook
16W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jen Katsoulis
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Kara Levin
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Margaret Chung
37W–18L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Morrissey
7W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Neena Will
18W–14L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Raydeen Neveril
10W–20L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Stephanie Mortimer
8W–16L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.