Teams

NITA S 40W18f Heritage (Jurczyk/Campanelli)

2023 NITA3 Summer Adult 18 & Over · NITA Summer Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

19 players · average NTRP 4.21 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-07-18Won 30
W#1 DoublesKristine Jurczyk / Dawn Baumann vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesPerry Mimms vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKayla Castellani / Maura Starshak vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-08vs NITA S 40W18b Rush Copley (Stine)Won 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Cushing / Tracy Richards vs Dorothy OMalley / Alicia Yaeger6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesPerry Mimms vs Tiffany Oken4-6, 3-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDebbie Schaefer / Leah Starkman vs Todra Oken / Sue Keough6-3, 6-2
2023-07-05vs NITA S 40W18e Score (Knutte)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAnna Dau / Kristine Jurczyk vs Lisa Rowen / Kelly Good1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesPerry Mimms vs Meghan Jones5-7, 0-3
L#2 DoublesLeah Starkman / Debbie Schaefer vs Laurie Knutte / Kristine Lonsway1-6, 4-6
2023-06-20vs NITA S 40W18e Score (Knutte)Won 40
W#1 DoublesErica Eisner / Soraya McTeague vs Kelly Tenuta / Ying Zhang6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesGinger Riessen vs Cindy Bielik4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKayla Castellani / Maura Starshak vs Laurie Knutte / Kelly Good6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesColleen Stover / Maureen Porter vs Peggy Sloyan / Kerri Sedlacek6-1, 6-1
2023-06-18vs NITA S 40W18c TAM (Wright)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesSoraya McTeague / Colleen Stover vs Stacey Cohen / Ashley Kaufman1-6, 6-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPerry Mimms vs Ruth Karakosta3-6, 3-4
L#2 DoublesAnna Dau / Julie Steinberg vs Alison Donnelly / Emily Shamrock4-6, 5-6
W#3 DoublesGinger Riessen / Erica Eisner vs Terri Whiting / Silvia Kusaka6-7, 5-3, 1-0
2023-06-10vs NITA S 40W18a Norris (Saguto)Won 40
W#1 DoublesAnna Dau / Kayla Castellani vs Vicki Mitchell / MEREDITH BETTCHER6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDebbie Schaefer vs Renee Buxton6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLeah Starkman / Lydia Vaughan vs Margaret Logsdon / Valerie Nagel7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Cushing / Tracy Richards vs Susie Wendel / Cheri Medus6-3, 6-5
W#1 DoublesDawn Baumann / Kristine Jurczyk vs Kristy Sweigard / Jennifer Peterson6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesGinger Riessen vs Katerina Hickey7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnna Dau / Colleen Stover vs Sara Olson / Katie Jones6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLeah Starkman / Jennifer Peck vs Michelle Yacullo / Stephanie Mortimer6-4, 6-4
2023-05-20vs NITA S 40W18b Rush Copley (Stine)Won 40
W#1 DoublesNancy Cushing / Dawn Baumann vs Martha Skryd / Dorothy OMalley6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesDebbie Schaefer vs Denise Rippetoe-Reed6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJennifer Peck / Ginger Riessen vs Kimberly Page / Todra Oken6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPerry Mimms / Lydia Vaughan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-07vs NITA S 40W18c TAM (Wright)Won 31
L#1 DoublesKristine Jurczyk / Dawn Baumann vs Terri Whiting / Keara Miller6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesPerry Mimms vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Cushing / Colleen Stover vs Jennifer Langtry / Colette Gramins6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnna Dau / Soraya McTeague vs Martha Davis / Ana Chang6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · NITA Summer Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA S 40W18c TAM (Wright)91301022234
2NITA S 40W18f Heritage (Jurczyk/Campanelli)72261023230
3NITA S 40W18e Score (Knutte)64271331293
4NITA S 40W18a Norris (Saguto)55182247353
5NITA S 40W18d Salt Creek (Levin/Jones)2792757386
6NITA S 40W18b Rush Copley (Stine)01063471447

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
4.16
Perry Mimms
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.02
Soraya McTeague
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.02
Anna Dau
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
4.00
Ginger Riessen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.96
Nancy Cushing
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.95
Colleen Stover
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.95
Dawn Baumann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Kristine Jurczyk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.90
Tracy Richards
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.82
Erica Eisner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Lydia Vaughan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Leah Starkman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Maura Starshak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Debbie Schaefer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
Jennifer Peck
published
Julie Steinberg
published
Kayla Castellani
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Maureen Porter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristine Jurczyk + Jennifer Peck12271% games+15.8% vs expected
Christine Campanelli + Jennifer Peck11363% games+13.3% vs expected
Erica Eisner + Nancy Cushing6077% games+13.1% vs expected
Maureen Porter + Colleen Stover15269% games+10.6% vs expected
Maureen Porter + Tracy Richards9357% games+9.9% vs expected
Erica Eisner + Ginger Riessen4162% games+9.9% vs expected
Dawn Baumann + Erica Eisner17366% games+7.9% vs expected
Maureen Porter + Nancy Cushing18461% games+7.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christine Campanelli
302W–137L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
4.33
4.5
Perry Mimms
120W–59L career · 6 lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Soraya McTeague
162W–103L career · 3 lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
4.02
4
Anna Dau
206W–99L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
4.02
4
Ginger Riessen
244W–127L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
4.00
Nancy Cushing
236W–117L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.96
4.5
Colleen Stover
89W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
3.95
4
Dawn Baumann
397W–165L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.95
4.5
Kristine Jurczyk
333W–130L career · 3 lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
3.90
Tracy Richards
117W–53L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.90
4
Erica Eisner
295W–139L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
Lydia Vaughan
59W–22L career · 1 line in 2023
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Leah Starkman
228W–152L career · 4 lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Maura Starshak
88W–46L career · 2 lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Debbie Schaefer
122W–107L career · 4 lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
3.59
Jennifer Peck
115W–55L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Steinberg
87W–36L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kayla Castellani
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Maureen Porter
108W–28L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.