Teams

MORAGA CC 40AW3.5B-DT

2025 ADULT 40&Over - Daytime · Women's 3.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
L#1 DoublesHeather Swedeen / Jennifer Nolen vs Annie Hahn / Sue Schwartzman6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJo Mckinlay vs Kelly Anderson6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesShelly Vezzali / Lucy Sponsler vs Kendall Calvert / Carmen Duarte6-2, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Anya Gorman
published 3.5
3.42
Cathy Harris
published 3.5
3.38
Lara Williamson
published
3.35
Sarah Franz
published
3.35
Jill Hudson
published
3.32
Jennifer Bahm
published
3.31
Shelly Vezzali
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Heather Swedeen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Michelle Holcenberg
published
3.24
Wendy Means
published
3.21
Kimberley Zembsch
published
3.21
Jennifer Nolen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Vanessa Imberg
published
3.18
Jo Mckinlay
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.12
Theresa Brewer
published
3.09
Gena Schwartz
published
2.87
Carolyn Edwards
published 3.5
2.57
Lisa Lavelle
published
Lucy Sponsler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vanessa Imberg + Michelle Holcenberg213 matchesnot enough data
Cathy Harris + Lara Williamson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anya Gorman
18W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
3.42
3.5
Cathy Harris
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Lara Williamson
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Sarah Franz
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Jill Hudson
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.35
Jennifer Bahm
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Shelly Vezzali
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Heather Swedeen
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Michelle Holcenberg
9W–20L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Wendy Means
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Kimberley Zembsch
7W–20L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Jennifer Nolen
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Vanessa Imberg
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Jo Mckinlay
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Theresa Brewer
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Gena Schwartz
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
3.5
Carolyn Edwards
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.87
Lisa Lavelle
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.57
Lucy Sponsler
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.