Teams

VALLEY VISTA RC/VVRC COURTS 40AW3.5A-DT

2025 ADULT 40&Over - Daytime · Women's 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-07vs ST MARY 40AW3.5A-DTWon 21
W#1 DoublesClaudia Polidori / Sue Schwartzman vs Kathy Simon / Linda Hofmeister2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKristina Karr vs Susan Rossi0-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDana Andrew / Wendy Schofield vs Angela Shiu / Rachel Schmidt3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-02-26vs MORAGA CC 40AW3.5B-DTWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnnie Hahn / Sue Schwartzman vs Heather Swedeen / Jennifer Nolen4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKendall Calvert / Carmen Duarte vs Shelly Vezzali / Lucy Sponsler2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-01-16vs CHABOT CANYON 40AW3.5A-DTLost 12
W#1 DoublesWendy Schofield / Dolores Schmidt vs Maryam Amini / Christina Stearns6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKristina Karr vs Srinika Narayan1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCarmen Duarte / Elizabeth Leach vs Una Elias / Patti Presto4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Dolores Schmidt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Annie Hahn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Dana Andrew
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Kendall Calvert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Corrine Christensen
published 3.5
3.12
Claudia Polidori
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Sue Schwartzman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Wendy Schofield
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Kristina Karr
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.84
Carmen Duarte
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Leach
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Heidi Timken
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Schofield + Kendall Calvert2348% games−1.3% vs expected
Kristina Karr + Corrine Christensen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Dolores Schmidt
7W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.35
3.5
Annie Hahn
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Dana Andrew
10W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Kendall Calvert
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Corrine Christensen
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Claudia Polidori
8W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Sue Schwartzman
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Wendy Schofield
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.10
Kristina Karr
5W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
3.5
Carmen Duarte
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
2.84
Elizabeth Leach
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Heidi Timken
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.