Teams

UPTA55A/Gruendling/Cardinal

2025 UPTA Adult 55 & Over - USTA · 55 Adult Women - 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.44 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-09vs UPTA55A/Kelley/Keowee KeyWon 30
W#1 DoublesDenise Malone / Katherine Robinson vs Peggy Braswell / Liz Turnure6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCynthia Forbes / Lorri Laufenberg vs Kathleen Hobus / Leslie Colomb6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDianne White / Susan Krzeminski vs Juanita Keranen / Judy Griffiths6-1, 6-1
2025-03-06vs UPTA55A/Loyd/BrookstoneWon 21
L#1 DoublesNancy Lanois / Katherine Robinson vs Teresa Carson / Donetta Dodwell2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLorri Laufenberg / Deborah Powell vs Sharon Colker / Judith Morand6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTari Dygert / Rebecca Gruendling vs Mary Cook / Annette Curin7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 Adult Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Sara Mower
published
Cornelia Buch
published 3.5
3.25
Tari Dygert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Deborah Powell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Christine Cole
published 3.5
3.21
Debbie Etherington
published 3.5
3.19
Denise Malone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Dianne White
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Cynthia Forbes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Lorri Laufenberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Rebecca Gruendling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Susan Krzeminski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Nancy Lanois
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Katherine Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Catherine Murry
published 3
Mary Suski
published
Windy Pruette
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Etherington + Deborah Powell6454% games−3.6% vs expected
Denise Malone + Katherine Robinson101346% games−8.4% vs expected
Debbie Etherington + Nancy Lanois1439% gamesnot enough data
Deborah Powell + Dianne White3257% gamesnot enough data
Deborah Powell + Tari Dygert2351% gamesnot enough data
Deborah Powell + Lorri Laufenberg224 matchesnot enough data
Sara Mower + Susan Krzeminski224 matchesnot enough data
Cynthia Forbes + Tari Dygert134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Mower
29W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.33
3.5
Cornelia Buch
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tari Dygert
43W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.25
3.5
Deborah Powell
26W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Christine Cole
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Debbie Etherington
19W–13L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Denise Malone
16W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Dianne White
19W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Cynthia Forbes
12W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.08
Lorri Laufenberg
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Rebecca Gruendling
12W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
Susan Krzeminski
36W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Nancy Lanois
12W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Katherine Robinson
17W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.90
3
Catherine Murry
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Suski
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Windy Pruette
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.