Teams

UPTA55A/Loyd/Brookstone

2025 UPTA Adult 55 & Over - USTA · 55 Adult Women - 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-02vs UPTA55A/Thomas/Keowee KeyLost 12
W#1 DoublesTeresa Carson / Marilyn Johnson vs Sharon Thomas / Wendy Jakszta6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDoni Willmering / Deana Fisher vs Sandra Franklin / Patricia Joy4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDonetta Dodwell / Sharon Colker vs Johnna Neri / Melissa Coles3-6, 5-7
2025-03-06vs UPTA55A/Gruendling/CardinalLost 12
W#1 DoublesTeresa Carson / Donetta Dodwell vs Nancy Lanois / Katherine Robinson6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSharon Colker / Judith Morand vs Lorri Laufenberg / Deborah Powell7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Cook / Annette Curin vs Tari Dygert / Rebecca Gruendling5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 Adult Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Marilyn Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Teresa Carson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Donetta Dodwell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Annette Curin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Peg Loyd
published
3.15
Sharon Colker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Doni Willmering
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Kelly Gaber
published
3.09
Deana Fisher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Angie McDade
published 3.5
Judith Morand
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marilyn Johnson + Teresa Carson9362% games+10.3% vs expected
Doni Willmering + Deana Fisher2443% games−8.3% vs expected
Teresa Carson + Donetta Dodwell224 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Gaber + Doni Willmering314 matchesnot enough data
Angie McDade + Annette Curin404 matchesnot enough data
Doni Willmering + Annette Curin134 matchesnot enough data
Marilyn Johnson + Donetta Dodwell213 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Colker + Annette Curin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marilyn Johnson
18W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.50
Teresa Carson
23W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.41
3.5
Donetta Dodwell
13W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Annette Curin
36W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Peg Loyd
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
Sharon Colker
6W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Doni Willmering
23W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
Kelly Gaber
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Deana Fisher
15W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Angie McDade
18W–24L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.05
Judith Morand
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.