Teams

UPTA55A/Thomas/Keowee Key

2025 UPTA Adult 55 & Over - USTA · 55 Adult Women - 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-02vs UPTA55A/Loyd/BrookstoneWon 21
L#1 DoublesSharon Thomas / Wendy Jakszta vs Teresa Carson / Marilyn Johnson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSandra Franklin / Patricia Joy vs Doni Willmering / Deana Fisher6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJohnna Neri / Melissa Coles vs Donetta Dodwell / Sharon Colker6-3, 7-5
2025-03-26vs UPTA55A/Kelley/Keowee KeyWon 30
W#1 DoublesWendy Jakszta / Sharon Thomas vs Jan Kelley / Kathleen Hobus6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDana Loring / Melissa Coles vs Aimee Fountain / Stacey Belkin6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPatricia Robertson / Catherine Twedt vs Carolyn Foster / Adrianne Brandecker6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 Adult Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Patricia Joy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Melissa Coles
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Sharon Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Dana Loring
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Johnna Neri
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Wendy Jakszta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Christine Woerz
published 3.5
3.00
Catherine Twedt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Patricia Robertson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sandra Franklin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Thomas + Wendy Jakszta4457% games+7.1% vs expected
Christine Woerz + Johnna Neri2355% games−3.8% vs expected
Wendy Jakszta + Dana Loring5453% games−4.5% vs expected
Sharon Thomas + Patricia Joy314 matchesnot enough data
Dana Loring + Johnna Neri134 matchesnot enough data
Christine Woerz + Sharon Thomas213 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Coles + Johnna Neri213 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Jakszta + Johnna Neri213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patricia Joy
15W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
Melissa Coles
25W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
Sharon Thomas
33W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Dana Loring
16W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%8%
3.31
Johnna Neri
22W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
Wendy Jakszta
19W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Christine Woerz
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Catherine Twedt
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
Patricia Robertson
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Franklin
12W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.