Teams

3-DBaddour-CHCC

2023 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · Eno River 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Men Evening

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-10-09vs 1-NPuri-EnoLost 02
L#2 DoublesToland Barfield / Vincent Aurentz vs Nishant Puri / Sid Thakur3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAllen Chan / David Baddour vs Manish Maheshwari / Ryan Jobling3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-09-13vs 1-NPuri-EnoLost 01
L#2 DoublesVincent Aurentz / Matt Moody vs Sandeep Verghese / Vijay Sharma4-6, 3-6
2023-09-06vs 1-NPuri-EnoLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Baddour / William Enright vs Mohit Bhatnagar / Asim Javaid4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesVincent Aurentz / Brice Englert vs Sandeep Verghese / Ryan Jobling0-6, 4-6
2023-08-28vs 2-DHenley-HVCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesVincent Aurentz / James Powell vs Daniel Berman / Evan Selig7-5, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Christian Shelby
published 4.5
3.83
David Baddour
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.83
Paul Hodulik
published
3.77
Jeff Tillman
published
3.58
William Enright
published
3.55
Vincent Aurentz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Shaun Horrigan
published
3.42
Matt Moody
published
3.26
Toland Barfield
published
3.25
James Powell
published
3.18
Brice Englert
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Tillman + Paul Hodulik213 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Tillman + Vincent Aurentz213 matchesnot enough data
Brice Englert + James Powell033 matchesnot enough data
Matt Moody + James Powell303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christian Shelby
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
4
David Baddour
124W–96L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%88%12%
3.83
Paul Hodulik
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%12%
3.83
Jeff Tillman
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
William Enright
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
27%72%<1%
3.58
4
Vincent Aurentz
44W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.55
Shaun Horrigan
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.50
Matt Moody
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
Toland Barfield
8W–1L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
James Powell
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Brice Englert
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.