Teams

Lob Stars

2025 Corpus Christi 18 & Over USTA League · 2.5 Ladies Flight

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-13vs Causing A RacketWon 21
L#1 DoublesDiane Henning / Marissa Alonzo-Ackerman vs Mayra Cerda / Leslie Hipp6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesKristi Gomez vs Kayla Havelka6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAshley Brown / Shelley Wallach vs Lauren Bowen / Emily Aronson6-1, 6-2
2025-05-01vs Slice Girls 2.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesSusan Apacible / Katherine Read vs Sarah de la Garza / Meghan Mandel1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKristi Gomez / Marissa Alonzo-Ackerman vs Christy Berry / Debbie Becquet6-1, 6-0
2025-04-17vs Causing A RacketWon 21
W#1 DoublesSheri Gagliano / Barbara Collins vs Christine Welker / Lauren Bowen6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDiane Henning vs Emily Aronson6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesShelley Wallach / Ashley Brown vs Mayra Cerda / Leslie Hipp2-6, 3-6
2025-04-10vs Slice Girls 2.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Apacible / Sheri Gagliano vs Diana Soto / Sarah de la Garza6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKatherine Read / Marissa Alonzo-Ackerman vs Claudia Lichtenberger / Christy Berry4-6, 4-6
2025-04-01vs Causing A RacketWon 30
W#1 DoublesSheri Gagliano / Barbara Collins vs Lauren Bowen / Leslie Hipp6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDiane Henning vs Kayla Havelka6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKristi Gomez / Marissa Alonzo-Ackerman vs Christine Welker / Ranelle Pressley6-1, 6-0
2025-03-20vs Slice Girls 2.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesKristi Gomez / Susan Apacible vs Claudia Lichtenberger / Meghan Mandel6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesDiane Henning vs Diana Soto1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSheri Gagliano / Ashley Brown vs Christy Berry / Debbie Becquet6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Ladies Flight have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.44
Sheri Gagliano
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.37
Diane Henning
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.34
Katherine Read
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.21
Marissa Alonzo-Ackerman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
1.90
Shelley Wallach
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kristi Gomez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Susan Apacible
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sheri Gagliano
13W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%68%32%
2.44
2.5
Diane Henning
13W–18L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%82%18%
2.37
Katherine Read
13W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.34
Marissa Alonzo-Ackerman
5W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Shelley Wallach
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.90
Kristi Gomez
8W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Apacible
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.