Teams

Causing A Racket

2025 Corpus Christi 18 & Over USTA League · 2.5 Ladies Flight

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-15vs Slice Girls 2.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMayra Cerda / Lauren Bowen vs Sarah de la Garza / Meghan Mandel1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLeslie Hipp / Emily Aronson vs Claudia Lichtenberger / Debbie Becquet3-6, 3-6
2025-05-13vs Lob StarsLost 12
W#1 DoublesMayra Cerda / Leslie Hipp vs Diane Henning / Marissa Alonzo-Ackerman7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKayla Havelka vs Kristi Gomez0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Bowen / Emily Aronson vs Ashley Brown / Shelley Wallach1-6, 2-6
2025-04-24vs Slice Girls 2.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKayla Havelka / Emily Aronson vs Meghan Mandel / Christy Berry0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMayra Cerda vs Diana Soto1-6, 0-6
2025-04-17vs Lob StarsLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristine Welker / Lauren Bowen vs Sheri Gagliano / Barbara Collins2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesEmily Aronson vs Diane Henning0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMayra Cerda / Leslie Hipp vs Shelley Wallach / Ashley Brown6-2, 6-3
2025-04-03vs Slice Girls 2.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLeslie Hipp / Christine Welker vs Sarah de la Garza / Meghan Mandel1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKayla Havelka vs Diana Soto6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEmily Aronson / Lauren Bowen vs Elizabeth Darkhabani / Debbie Becquet2-6, 3-6
2025-04-01vs Lob StarsLost 03
L#1 DoublesLauren Bowen / Leslie Hipp vs Sheri Gagliano / Barbara Collins2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKayla Havelka vs Diane Henning3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesChristine Welker / Ranelle Pressley vs Kristi Gomez / Marissa Alonzo-Ackerman1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Ladies Flight have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.00 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.35
Kayla Havelka
usually #2 Singles 27%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
2.16
Mayra Cerda
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
1.85
Christine Welker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.65
Emily Aronson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Leslie Hipp
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Ranelle Pressley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kayla Havelka
5W–14L career · 10 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.35
Mayra Cerda
2W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.16
2.5
Christine Welker
3W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.85
Emily Aronson
0W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.65
Leslie Hipp
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ranelle Pressley
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.