Teams

BTC:Bloomfield Bobcats:Wu/Datsko

2021 NCT Adult 18 & Over Men · 4.0 Adult Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.92 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2020-11-21vs NTC:GriffithSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAndrew Robinson / Rick Wu vs Thomas Bissell / Vinay Singh7-6, 6-2
L#2 SinglesEapen Mathew vs Eric Milman6-2, 3-6, 3-5
2020-10-31vs GTC:BlairLost 04
L#1 DoublesJason Lang / Anton Hu vs Jeff DePersia / David Chung1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesRick Wu / Brian Liu vs Michael Blair / Jonathan Brown1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesBalachander Sekar vs Matthew Kirk6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAndrew Robinson / Vasisht Venkatesh vs Jordan Krane / Scot MacElhiney6-7, 3-6
2020-10-17vs EHTC:Silverstein/ShuckLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnton Hu / Andrew Robinson vs David Silverstein / Todd Schuck6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRick Wu / Vasisht Venkatesh vs Alexander Lovejoy / James Wiley5-7, 0-6
L#2 SinglesEapen Mathew vs William Meng1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Jason Lang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Andrew Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
David Gates
published 4
3.73
Calvin Dees
published 4
3.60
Anton Hu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Balachander Sekar
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.42
Eapen Mathew
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Rick Wu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Vasisht Venkatesh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Robinson + Vasisht Venkatesh2445% games−3.7% vs expected
Jason Lang + Anton Hu7456% games−4.0% vs expected
Rick Wu + Vasisht Venkatesh2439% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Robinson + Rick Wu213 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Robinson + Jason Lang303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Lang
118W–53L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.84
4
Andrew Robinson
12W–21L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
David Gates
8W–14L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Calvin Dees
0W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Anton Hu
14W–17L career · 2 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Balachander Sekar
6W–11L career · type S · 7 lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Eapen Mathew
31W–21L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
3.42
Rick Wu
26W–42L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Vasisht Venkatesh
26W–37L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.