Teams

GTC:Blair

2021 NCT Adult 18 & Over Men · 4.0 Adult Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2021-03-27vs NTC:GriffithSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJeff DePersia / Edgardo Vazquez vs Paul Salonia / Paul Cohen6-4, 3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Smith / Jordan Krane vs Thomas Bissell / Vinay Singh6-4, 7-5
2020-10-31vs BTC:Bloomfield Bobcats:Wu/DatskoWon 40
W#1 DoublesJeff DePersia / David Chung vs Jason Lang / Anton Hu6-1, 7-6
W#1 SinglesJeffrey Smith vs David Chiu6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Blair / Jonathan Brown vs Rick Wu / Brian Liu6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJordan Krane / Scot MacElhiney vs Andrew Robinson / Vasisht Venkatesh7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 4.0 Adult Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RH:Jackson:Jackson/Ortiz62231739384
2GTC:Blair2091266
3MLM:Lusardi23131225262
4EHTC:Silverstein/Shuck1050136
5MRC:Court Jesters :Mayo14101531277
6BSF:Dell’Aera1592146351
7SIMS:Franklin/Rangnekar000000
8NTC:Griffith022818122

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Scot MacElhiney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Matthew Kirk
published
3.64
Jordan Krane
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Jeff DePersia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Michael Blair
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Edgardo Vazquez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
David Chung
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jeffrey Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
William Moorcroft
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Blair + Edgardo Vazquez4651% games+5.8% vs expected
Jeff DePersia + David Chung6257% games+3.9% vs expected
Jordan Krane + Jeff DePersia3346% games−4.6% vs expected
Edgardo Vazquez + Jeff DePersia1442% gamesnot enough data
Jordan Krane + Edgardo Vazquez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scot MacElhiney
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2021
2%94%5%
3.78
Matthew Kirk
7W–19L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.64
Jordan Krane
30W–20L career · 2 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.64
Jeff DePersia
25W–27L career · 2 lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.63
Michael Blair
29W–39L career · 1 line in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Edgardo Vazquez
23W–65L career · 1 line in 2021
38%62%<1%
3.54
David Chung
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Jeffrey Smith
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
William Moorcroft
11W–19L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.