Teams

LTKAdams/Jetton Tri C

2023 Lake USTA Tri Level Level 18 & Over · Women's Group C 2.5, 3.0 & 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-26vs LTKNardone/Jetton Tri CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChristine Miles / Valerie Richmond vs Ann Modlin / Christine Tattersfield4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJodi Vose / Christine Marcavish vs Susan King / Jennifer Saxton0-6, 2-6
2023-07-19vs LCRupp/StatesvilleCC Tri CLost 12
L#1 DoublesTammy Cline / Nicole Francomano vs Devon Stamey / Kelly Stamey0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJulia Grainda / Christine Marcavish vs Corrine Rupp / Lisa Bograd6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmy English / Ann Stawski vs Tiffany Botkins / Amy Lawton6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-07-12vs LTAWages/River Run Tri CWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristine Miles / Jodi Vose vs Amy Ward / Brooke Harris3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesValerie Richmond / Kristin Miller vs Tara Hauk / Nikki Howard6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesErin Lee / Suzy Wright vs Jennifer Vidmer / Beth Szostek6-1, 6-2
2023-06-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesJulia Grainda / Valerie Richmond vs Katie Huffstetler / Callie Dobbins6-4, 6-3
2023-06-15vs LTNHibsch/Jetton Tri CLost 12
L#1 DoublesTammy Cline / Lori Eason vs Julie Nance / Emily Heinemann Hamilton5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJulia Grainda / Nicole Francomano vs Nancy Hibsch / Sara Baxter6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSuzy Wright / Erin Lee vs Erin Pickens / Alexandra Grune1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-06-14vs LTMCollins/Westport TriCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLori Eason / Christine Miles vs Danielle Curwood / Nicole Cochran5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKristin Miller / Christine Marcavish vs Meagan Palmer / Rebecca Karner3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's Group C 2.5, 3.0 & 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Nicole Francomano
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Valerie Richmond
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.96
Lori Eason
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Christine Marcavish
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Jodi Vose
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.66
Amy English
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.45
Suzy Wright
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.20
Ann Stawski
published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nicole Francomano
31W–26L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3
Valerie Richmond
44W–41L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%29%71%
3.07
3
Lori Eason
11W–18L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Christine Marcavish
40W–54L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Jodi Vose
64W–82L career · 5 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Amy English
37W–46L career · 1 line in 2023
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Suzy Wright
31W–86L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
2.45
2.5
Ann Stawski
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.