Teams

LTMCollins/Westport TriC

2023 Lake USTA Tri Level Level 18 & Over · Women's Group C 2.5, 3.0 & 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.32 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-26vs LTNHibsch/Jetton Tri CWon 10
W#2 DoublesAngela Jakeway / Rebecca Karner vs Sheryl Theisen / Kelli Rester6-3, 6-0
2023-07-19vs LTKNardone/Jetton Tri CLost 03
L#1 DoublesNicole Cochran / Katherine Trask vs Jaime Cooper / Allison Terry4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBridgett Dedmond / Rebecca Karner vs Nicole Monacell / Bonnie Zentner2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDIANE FIORE / JESSICA WOLTER vs Joy Evans / Nancy Dobratz2-6, 2-6
2023-07-12vs LCRupp/StatesvilleCC Tri CLost 03
L#1 DoublesKatherine Trask / Meagan Palmer vs Mindy Sells / Andrea Sain4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAngela Childers / Marilou Martin vs Cori Peters / Aimee Reimann4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesShannon Malmstrom / JESSICA WOLTER vs Lawren Wells / Amy Lawton3-6, 4-6
2023-06-29vs LTAWages/River Run Tri CWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Collins / Katherine Trask vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMeagan Palmer / Angela Childers vs Julie Lyerly / Laurie Sepulveda1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJESSICA WOLTER / DIANE FIORE vs Julia McKee / Jennifer Vidmer6-3, 6-4
2023-06-27vs LVCiucci/Northstone Tri CWon 21
L#1 DoublesMelissa Collins / Katherine Trask vs Jennifer Nogowski / Leenee Roberge6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAngela Childers / Angela Jakeway vs Susan Newman / Katie Scruggs7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesShannon Malmstrom / JESSICA WOLTER vs Carrie Rich / Erica Howard6-2, 6-2
2023-06-14vs LTKAdams/Jetton Tri CLost 12
L#1 DoublesDanielle Curwood / Nicole Cochran vs Lori Eason / Christine Miles7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMeagan Palmer / Rebecca Karner vs Kristin Miller / Christine Marcavish6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDIANE FIORE / JESSICA WOLTER vs Erin Lee / Ann Stawski7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's Group C 2.5, 3.0 & 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Rebecca Karner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Danielle Curwood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.55
Marilou Martin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.52
Bridgett Dedmond
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Katherine Trask
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.23
Melissa Collins
published
3.07
Angela Childers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Nicole Cochran
published
3.01
Carrie Davin
published 3
2.86
Angela Jakeway
usually #3 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.79
JESSICA WOLTER
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Shannon Malmstrom
published
2.64
DIANE FIORE
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Laura Gallapis
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Curwood + Marilou Martin7359% games+12.9% vs expected
Bridgett Dedmond + Rebecca Karner291058% games+6.4% vs expected
DIANE FIORE + JESSICA WOLTER7949% games−2.1% vs expected
Carrie Davin + Laura Gallapis7266% gamesnot enough data
Danielle Curwood + Carrie Davin6261% gamesnot enough data
JESSICA WOLTER + Carrie Davin4165% gamesnot enough data
JESSICA WOLTER + Laura Gallapis3256% gamesnot enough data
Bridgett Dedmond + Katherine Trask134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rebecca Karner
95W–42L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
3.5
Danielle Curwood
204W–137L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%5%95%
3.73
3.5
Marilou Martin
110W–88L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.55
3.5
Bridgett Dedmond
91W–61L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Katherine Trask
34W–41L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Melissa Collins
10W–18L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Angela Childers
80W–56L career · 3 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
Nicole Cochran
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.07
3
Carrie Davin
125W–59L career · no lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Angela Jakeway
71W–69L career · 9 lines in 2023
1%84%15%
2.86
3
JESSICA WOLTER
57W–41L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
Shannon Malmstrom
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
2.76
3
DIANE FIORE
66W–62L career · 3 lines in 2023
15%84%1%
2.64
3
Laura Gallapis
71W–67L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.