Teams

Suntree - Reza

2025 Brevard Adult 18 & Over Early Start · 2.5 Adult Early-Start 18 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.75 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-12-04vs Fee - TorcuatorWon 21
L#1 DoublesValquiria Zalewski / Karen Bastos vs Brenda Tarquinio / Daricca Facciobene1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesChrissy James vs Faith Torcuator6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJANETTE TABOR / Kathryn Nitti vs Debra Grayson / Sandy Cuddeback3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-11-13vs Kiwi - RaymondWon 21
L#1 DoublesMaria Reza / Tracy Thomas vs Tiffany Gragg / Heather Taylor1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesValquiria Zalewski vs Elise Johnson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Allen / Kathryn Nitti vs Lisa Sexton / Danielle Carlson6-4, 6-3
2024-10-23vs Fee - TorcuatorLost 12
L#1 DoublesJANETTE TABOR / Deborah Tuttle vs Daricca Facciobene / Michelle Dunn3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesChrissy James vs Jenna Bajus6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKathryn Nitti / Tracy Thomas vs Sandy Cuddeback / Debra Grayson2-6, 6-7
2024-10-21vs Kiwi - RaymondLost 03
L#1 DoublesJANETTE TABOR / Maria Reza vs Heather Taylor / Elise Johnson2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesChrissy James vs Melissa Yanko7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesValquiria Zalewski / Lisa Allen vs Jenifer Raymond / Tiffany Gragg6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult Early-Start 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Chrissy James
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.60
Valquiria Zalewski
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.53
JANETTE TABOR
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.48
Maria Reza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.31
Kathryn Nitti
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.28
Deborah Tuttle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.01
Mary Overton
published
Karen Bastos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Tuttle + Maria Reza213 matchesnot enough data
Valquiria Zalewski + Karen Bastos213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chrissy James
10W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Valquiria Zalewski
7W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%24%76%
2.60
JANETTE TABOR
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%41%59%
2.53
Maria Reza
14W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%56%44%
2.48
Kathryn Nitti
3W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.31
2.5
Deborah Tuttle
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28
Mary Overton
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Karen Bastos
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.