Teams

Naples Bay Resort - Campisi

2022 Collier Adult 40 & Over Winter · 4.5 Adult 40 & over Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.43 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-03vs COLLIER - Vineyards - HancockLost 01
L#1 DoublesValerie Khammash / Christy Eibel vs Karen Defiore / Suzanne McAllister4-6, 2-6
2022-02-17vs COLLIER - Vineyards - HancockLost 02
L#1 DoublesRenea Tucker / Allison Lebo vs Stefanie Decker / Tara Newhall1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLissa Andrakakos / Karen Morand vs Sara Mcguinn / Joan Lancellot5-7, 1-6
2022-02-10vs COLLIER - Vineyards - HancockLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmanda Myers / Karen Morand vs Kristy Cardina / Carolyn Matje2-6, 3-6
2022-02-03vs COLLIER - Vineyards - HancockLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura Jolly / Christy Eibel vs Lynne Hancock / Suzanne McAllister6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAllison Lebo / Jenny Frantz vs Jane Lizell / Stefanie Decker6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2022-01-27vs COLLIER - Vineyards - HancockLost 02
L#1 DoublesAllison Lebo / Valerie Khammash vs Kristy Cardina / Carolyn Matje2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Hood / Christy Eibel vs Lynn Johns / Rebecca Tessitore4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-01-20vs COLLIER - Vineyards - HancockLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristy Eibel / Amanda Stanosheck vs Lynne Hancock / Tara Newhall0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-01-13Won 10
W#3 DoublesChristy Eibel / Amanda Myers vs Diane Johannes-Schwab / Sara Mcguinn6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 40 & over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Nannette Staropoli
published 4.5
4.28
Dorie Barber
published 4.5
4.15
Julie Hood
published
4.13
Amanda Stanosheck
published 4.5
4.12
Karen Morand
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.11
Allison Lebo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.99
Jennifer Hansen
published
3.87
Cheryl Cohen
published 4.5
3.85
Jenny Frantz
published
3.80
Karen Huffman
published
Christy Eibel
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
Lissa Andrakakos
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Nannette Staropoli
98W–95L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
4.36
Mary Miranda-Del Rossi
14W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Dorie Barber
22W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Hood
32W–18L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.15
4.5
Amanda Stanosheck
2W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Karen Morand
72W–60L career · 2 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
4.12
4.5
Allison Lebo
22W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
4.11
Jennifer Hansen
20W–16L career · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
3.99
4.5
Cheryl Cohen
82W–56L career · no lines in 2022
85%15%<1%
3.87
Jenny Frantz
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
Karen Huffman
12W–20L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Christy Eibel
50W–52L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lissa Andrakakos
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.