Teams

Team 2 The Ringers

2025 NOVA Singles · NOVA Singles 4.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-20vs Team 3 CamrynWon 10
W#2 SinglesJenna Gietl vs Maria Maebius6-1, 6-2
2025-10-05vs Team 3 CamrynLost 01
L#1 SinglesShayna Ginster vs Shruti Srinivasan3-6, 2-0
2025-09-20vs Team 3 CamrynWon 20
W#1 SinglesShayna Ginster vs Jennifer Mitchell6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJenna Gietl vs Shruti Srinivasan6-4, 5-4
2025-09-15vs Team 1 Kim- 4.5 SinglesWon 10
W#1 SinglesShayna Ginster vs Ana Maria Pena Castro6-2, 2-3
2025-09-09vs Team 3 CamrynWon 20
W#1 SinglesJenna Gietl vs Shruti Srinivasan6-4, 4-1
W#3 SinglesNancy Sicairos vs Margarita Baldwin6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Singles 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.17 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
Shayna Ginster
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.46
Emma Shine
published
4.41
Lily Kosegarten
published
4.39
Jennifer Holliday
published
4.31
Jenna Gietl
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.20
Amy Bundy
published 4.5
4.13
Jessica Coleman
published
3.98
Nancy Sicairos
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.88
Candice Rininger
published 4
3.44
Lori Reed
published
Tara Jakubik
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Coleman + Emma Shine5260% games+9.6% vs expected
Jenna Gietl + Shayna Ginster5062% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Shayna Ginster
63W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.53
Emma Shine
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
4.46
Lily Kosegarten
16W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
4.41
Jennifer Holliday
31W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
4.39
4.5
Jenna Gietl
133W–117L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Amy Bundy
65W–61L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
Jessica Coleman
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Nancy Sicairos
367W–75L career · 1 line in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.98
4
Candice Rininger
106W–90L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.88
Lori Reed
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.44
Tara Jakubik
36W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.