Teams

CP: I'd Hit That: Hager

2025 SCT Adult 18 & Over COMBO (Women) summer · 6.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-27vs 4S:Deuces Wild:Marcus/BiltoftWon 20
W#1 DoublesShelley Gibson / Shari Soloway vs Kim Biltoft / Laura Rowley7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKathryn Doran / Alicia Cintron vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-28vs 4S:Perfectly Matched:GiffLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Neyer / Shari Soloway vs Wendy English / Lisa Potash1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAmelie Vanier / Rachel Hager vs Janel Downs / Christine Gaspar6-7, 4-5
L#3 DoublesMary Abbazia / Shelley Gibson vs Carven Albanese / Laura Denis1-6, 3-6
2025-06-08vs MRC:Double and Bubbles:BandakSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHege Barnes / Shari Soloway vs Kim Bandak / Kristen Bradley0-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMary Abbazia / Amelie Vanier vs Christina Morgan / Denise DeMarco6-1, 6-3
2025-06-01vs CP: Over Served:Brown/MastersWon 21
L#1 DoublesKathryn Doran / Megan Powell vs Nancy Brewer / Carly Robinson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMary Abbazia / Amelie Vanier vs Alicja Skinner / Anna Nelson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJessie Brand / Rachel Hager vs Rebecca Masters / Malloury Miller5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesShari Soloway / Maureen Pollack vs Marjan Verhelst / Elise Klein6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMichelle Fine / Olga Burke vs Carla Carroll / Ellen Clarke7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmelie Vanier / Rachel Hager vs Jaime Wilkes / Danielle Polizzi6-4, 6-3
W#1 DoublesMegan Powell / Shari Soloway vs Meredith Naidorf / Myra Goldberg6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichelle Lesser / Shelley Gibson vs Margaret Woolverton / Kim Gibson6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAlicia Cintron / Daniela Becher vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
14S:Perfectly Matched:Giff6114718177
2WRC:One Hit Wonders:Hamelin/Naidorf4281022167
3TCT:The Game Changers:Hawley/Schoffstall4313816150
4CP: I'd Hit That: Hager43111022165
5MRC:Double and Bubbles:Bandak3310821156
6CP: Over Served:Brown/Masters34111024182
7SOL:Tennis Tennis Bobennis:Woolwine34101124180
84S:Deuces Wild:Marcus/Biltoft0741735231

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Amelie Vanier
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Michelle Lesser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Jessie Brand
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Maureen Pollack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Hege Barnes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Daniela Becher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Shari Soloway
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Olga Burke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Alicia Cintron
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Rachel Hager
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Mary Abbazia
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Carolyn Neyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Kathryn Doran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Megan Powell
published
Michelle Fine
published
Shelley Gibson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hege Barnes + Shari Soloway3264% games+13.2% vs expected
Olga Burke + Michelle Lesser4166% games+10.8% vs expected
Michelle Fine + Olga Burke7262% games+7.7% vs expected
Kathryn Doran + Carolyn Neyer3353% games+3.7% vs expected
Carolyn Neyer + Shari Soloway3353% games−0.3% vs expected
Maureen Pollack + Jessie Brand3348% games−1.2% vs expected
Michelle Fine + Carolyn Neyer3545% games−4.6% vs expected
Shelley Gibson + Mary Abbazia3841% games−8.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amelie Vanier
25W–53L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Michelle Lesser
65W–41L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Jessie Brand
23W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Maureen Pollack
43W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Hege Barnes
33W–48L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Daniela Becher
70W–85L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Shari Soloway
35W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
Olga Burke
49W–55L career · 1 line in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.95
3
Alicia Cintron
197W–128L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Rachel Hager
38W–46L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
Mary Abbazia
44W–58L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Carolyn Neyer
28W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Kathryn Doran
25W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Megan Powell
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Fine
30W–26L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shelley Gibson
31W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.