Teams

WRC:One Hit Wonders:Hamelin/Naidorf

2025 SCT Adult 18 & Over COMBO (Women) summer · 6.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.10 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesJennifer Barry / Anna Eliseenkova vs Carla Carroll / Helene Neigler6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesHiam Asmar / Lorraine Cassol vs Jaime Wilkes / Danielle Polizzi3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKristen Campbell / Myra Goldberg vs Shirley Barban / Stefanie Vitti3-6, 1-6
2025-06-05vs CP: Over Served:Brown/MastersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKim Gibson / Nancy Huang vs Sarah Vandekerckhove / Ingrid Sarver6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Lang / Suzanna Quinn vs Tara Robinson / Melanie Gillespie2-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesPamela Jennings / Kristen Campbell vs Alissa Wilson / Tara Schoffstall5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSuzanna Quinn / Hiam Asmar vs Supreeti Saikia / Christine Kay4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJacquie Hirschhorn / Lauren Zirn vs Randa Trivisonno / Audrey Gonzalez0-6, 2-6
2025-04-27vs 4S:Deuces Wild:Marcus/BiltoftWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnna Eliseenkova / Meredith Naidorf vs Kim Biltoft / Gwen Burmester6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnna Liu / Kristen Campbell vs Dinah Cassidy / Nicole Woodring4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKim Gibson / Hiam Asmar vs Bebe McCarthy / Anne Marcus6-3, 7-5
2025-03-23vs CP: I'd Hit That: HagerLost 02
L#1 DoublesMeredith Naidorf / Myra Goldberg vs Megan Powell / Shari Soloway4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Woolverton / Kim Gibson vs Michelle Lesser / Shelley Gibson4-6, 1-6
2025-03-22vs 4S:Perfectly Matched:GiffWon 21
L#1 DoublesLorraine Cassol / Kim Gibson vs Janel Downs / Amanda Bergen6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Barry / Kristen Campbell vs Susan Daly / Toni Lee7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSuzanna Quinn / Amy Lang vs Cynthia Tornallyay / Laura Denis6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
14S:Perfectly Matched:Giff6114718177
2WRC:One Hit Wonders:Hamelin/Naidorf4281022167
3TCT:The Game Changers:Hawley/Schoffstall4313816150
4CP: I'd Hit That: Hager43111022165
5MRC:Double and Bubbles:Bandak3310821156
6CP: Over Served:Brown/Masters34111024182
7SOL:Tennis Tennis Bobennis:Woolwine34101124180
84S:Deuces Wild:Marcus/Biltoft0741735231

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Meredith Naidorf
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Nancy Huang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Marcia Hamelin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Pamela Jennings
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.20
Anna Liu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Suzanna Quinn
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Jennifer Barry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Lauren Zirn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Anna Eliseenkova
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Margaret Woolverton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Myra Goldberg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Hiam Asmar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jacquie Hirschhorn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Amy Lang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Lorraine Cassol
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcia Hamelin + Lauren Zirn10264% games+10.9% vs expected
Suzanna Quinn + Pamela Jennings8159% games+9.5% vs expected
Anna Liu + Nancy Huang9164% games+9.4% vs expected
Meredith Naidorf + Pamela Jennings21668% games+8.1% vs expected
Jennifer Barry + Suzanna Quinn231256% games+6.9% vs expected
Marcia Hamelin + Meredith Naidorf4263% games+6.6% vs expected
Margaret Woolverton + Hiam Asmar3549% games+6.1% vs expected
Marcia Hamelin + Pamela Jennings7358% games+5.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meredith Naidorf
78W–47L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.64
Nancy Huang
30W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Marcia Hamelin
83W–77L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Pamela Jennings
70W–42L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Anna Liu
37W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Suzanna Quinn
70W–53L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.14
Jennifer Barry
40W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
Lauren Zirn
48W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Anna Eliseenkova
110W–127L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Margaret Woolverton
76W–68L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
Myra Goldberg
75W–54L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Hiam Asmar
88W–76L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Jacquie Hirschhorn
13W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Amy Lang
24W–72L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Lorraine Cassol
13W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.