Teams

SWhitney/NHaskins (Park Road)

2024 Tri-Level 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 2.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.06 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesStacey Whitney / Melissa Weaver vs Alyson Sunden / Lesley Quick3-6, 3-6
2024-06-20vs JHarling (Jeff Adams)Won 20
W#1 DoublesMelissa Weaver / Donna Musante vs Jennifer Harling / Jinna Harmon3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJackie Gyoerkoe / Elizabeth Myers vs Abby Gipe / Stephani Long6-3, 6-2
2024-06-13vs LMadonna/PTrantham (WSRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesStacey Whitney / Melissa Weaver vs Gabriella Gibson / Kimberly Clark6-2, 6-2
2024-05-30vs MTurturro/LBottle (OPRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesJackie Gyoerkoe / Karen Moss vs Janet Newton / Eileen Jones6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Nikki Haskins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Donna Musante
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.35
Stacey Whitney
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 46% · published 3.5
3.20
Melissa Weaver
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.79
Trisha Hyso
published
2.79
Jackie Gyoerkoe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Elizabeth Myers
published
2.49
Brooks Herman
published 2.5
2.31
Allison Geoghegan
published 2.5
2.27
Alexis Whitney
published 2.5
2.25
Rebecca Musante
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacey Whitney + Nikki Haskins302255% games+1.7% vs expected
Melissa Weaver + Nikki Haskins6656% games−0.1% vs expected
Stacey Whitney + Donna Musante4358% games−5.9% vs expected
Nikki Haskins + Donna Musante9260% gamesnot enough data
Stacey Whitney + Melissa Weaver3449% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nikki Haskins
153W–102L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Donna Musante
352W–175L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Stacey Whitney
179W–136L career · 11 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Melissa Weaver
82W–92L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
Trisha Hyso
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Jackie Gyoerkoe
45W–49L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
Elizabeth Myers
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.76
2.5
Brooks Herman
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%53%47%
2.49
2.5
Allison Geoghegan
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%91%9%
2.31
2.5
Alexis Whitney
11W–20L career · no lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.27
Rebecca Musante
8W–27L career · no lines in 2024
0%96%4%
2.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.