Teams

FF:SenoritasNueve:Bosworth:Gilman

2024 ME Adult 55 & Over Women · 9.0 55 & Over 1

13 players · average NTRP 4.10 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-18vs Apex:Holmes:FinneralLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Neff / Holly Steele vs Debora Kelly / Nancy Nevils0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Bosworth / Barbee Gilman vs Camille Madden / Lori Holmes4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLori Poulin / Odette Thurston vs Lisa Finneral / Kristine Sullivan2-6, 0-6
2024-05-18vs Apex:Holmes:FinneralLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristen Martin / Lori Poulin vs Lori Holmes / Camille Madden0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHolly Steele / Barbara Neff vs Lisa Finneral / Debora Kelly2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAnne Bosworth / Barbee Gilman vs Kristine Sullivan / Nancy Nevils6-1, 6-0
2024-05-11vs Apex:Holmes:FinneralLost 03
L#1 DoublesHolly Steele / Lori Poulin vs Lori Holmes / Lisa Finneral6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesOdette Thurston / Sue Strasenburgh vs Nancy Nevils / Debora Kelly0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBarbee Gilman / Karen Ferguson vs Jennifer Taylor / Barbara Bailey0-6, 1-6
2024-05-11vs Apex:Holmes:FinneralLost 02
L#1 DoublesBarbee Gilman / Holly Steele vs Lisa Finneral / Nancy Nevils0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLori Poulin / Sue Strasenburgh vs Jennifer Taylor / Barbara Bailey6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2024-04-14vs Apex:Holmes:FinneralLost 12
L#1 DoublesDeanna Mao / Kristen Martin vs Lisa Finneral / Lianne Cronin3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Neff / Martha Burchenal vs Stephanie Caron / Kristine Sullivan5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Wolcott / Holly Steele vs Nancy Bulkley / Pamela Sweet6-3, 6-1
2024-04-14vs Apex:Holmes:FinneralLost 12
L#1 DoublesDonna Dwyer / Kristen Martin vs Lisa Finneral / Lianne Cronin5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Wolcott / Holly Steele vs Stephanie Caron / Kristine Sullivan6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMartha Burchenal / Barbara Neff vs Nancy Bulkley / Pamela Sweet2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 55 & Over 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Anne Bosworth
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
3.93
Donna Dwyer
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.85
Deanna Mao
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.75
Holly Steele
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 46% · published
3.69
Barbara Neff
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Barbee Gilman
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.45
Jennifer Wolcott
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.42
Lori Poulin
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.41
Sue Strasenburgh
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.32
Kristen Martin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Karen Ferguson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Martha Burchenal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Odette Thurston
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Poulin + Holly Steele4258% games+6.6% vs expected
Barbara Neff + Kristen Martin5256% games+5.5% vs expected
Deanna Mao + Holly Steele7461% games+1.7% vs expected
Martha Burchenal + Barbara Neff5354% games+1.5% vs expected
Barbee Gilman + Donna Dwyer3447% games+0.1% vs expected
Deanna Mao + Donna Dwyer211252% games−0.1% vs expected
Anne Bosworth + Barbee Gilman543355% games−0.2% vs expected
Barbara Neff + Odette Thurston6653% games−3.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anne Bosworth
78W–38L career · 8 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
4.09
Donna Dwyer
130W–70L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.93
4
Deanna Mao
111W–65L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.85
Holly Steele
53W–34L career · 11 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Barbara Neff
56W–34L career · 9 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Barbee Gilman
100W–83L career · 9 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
Jennifer Wolcott
38W–32L career · 5 lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
3.45
4
Lori Poulin
96W–117L career · 6 lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
3.42
Sue Strasenburgh
58W–139L career · 8 lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
3.41
Kristen Martin
28W–35L career · 5 lines in 2024
90%10%<1%
3.32
Karen Ferguson
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Martha Burchenal
31W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Odette Thurston
23W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.