Teams

Apex:Holmes:Finneral

2024 ME Adult 55 & Over Women · 9.0 55 & Over 1

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-18vs FF:SenoritasNueve:Bosworth:GilmanWon 30
W#1 DoublesDebora Kelly / Nancy Nevils vs Barbara Neff / Holly Steele6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCamille Madden / Lori Holmes vs Anne Bosworth / Barbee Gilman6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLisa Finneral / Kristine Sullivan vs Lori Poulin / Odette Thurston6-2, 6-0
2024-05-18vs FF:SenoritasNueve:Bosworth:GilmanWon 21
W#1 DoublesLori Holmes / Camille Madden vs Kristen Martin / Lori Poulin6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Finneral / Debora Kelly vs Holly Steele / Barbara Neff6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKristine Sullivan / Nancy Nevils vs Anne Bosworth / Barbee Gilman1-6, 0-6
2024-05-11vs FF:SenoritasNueve:Bosworth:GilmanWon 20
W#1 DoublesLori Holmes / Lisa Finneral vs Holly Steele / Lori Poulin7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Nevils / Debora Kelly vs Odette Thurston / Sue Strasenburgh6-0, 6-0
2024-05-11vs FF:SenoritasNueve:Bosworth:GilmanWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Finneral / Nancy Nevils vs Barbee Gilman / Holly Steele6-0, 6-2
2024-04-14vs FF:SenoritasNueve:Bosworth:GilmanWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Finneral / Lianne Cronin vs Donna Dwyer / Kristen Martin7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesStephanie Caron / Kristine Sullivan vs Jennifer Wolcott / Holly Steele4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Bulkley / Pamela Sweet vs Martha Burchenal / Barbara Neff2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-14vs FF:SenoritasNueve:Bosworth:GilmanWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Finneral / Lianne Cronin vs Deanna Mao / Kristen Martin6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesStephanie Caron / Kristine Sullivan vs Barbara Neff / Martha Burchenal7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Bulkley / Pamela Sweet vs Jennifer Wolcott / Holly Steele3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 55 & Over 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Camille Madden
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Debora Kelly
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.13
Lisa Finneral
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
4.05
Nancy Nevils
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.03
Lianne Cronin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.02
Kristine Sullivan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.99
Nancy Bulkley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Lori Holmes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Taylor
published
Pamela Sweet
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Caron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Caron + Lori Holmes6163% games+12.7% vs expected
Lisa Finneral + Lori Holmes5553% games+9.5% vs expected
Nancy Nevils + Lisa Finneral5355% games+6.6% vs expected
Lianne Cronin + Lori Holmes3444% games+5.6% vs expected
Nancy Nevils + Lori Holmes4254% games+2.5% vs expected
Kristine Sullivan + Lisa Finneral8156% games+0.0% vs expected
Nancy Bulkley + Lianne Cronin5746% games−2.5% vs expected
Lianne Cronin + Lisa Finneral7749% games−6.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Camille Madden
29W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Debora Kelly
13W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Finneral
254W–151L career · 6 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
4.13
Nancy Nevils
38W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
4.05
Lianne Cronin
34W–36L career · 2 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
4.03
Kristine Sullivan
27W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
4.02
Nancy Bulkley
25W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.99
Lori Holmes
41W–35L career · 3 lines in 2024
99%1%<1%
3.65
Jennifer Taylor
35W–43L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Pamela Sweet
11W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephanie Caron
45W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.