Teams

LTP/DI Peiffer 64 & Over

LCTA 64 & Over Fall League · 64 & Over - Men 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 64 & Over - Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
David Hubbard
published 3.5
3.41
Michael Ward
published
3.26
Robert Zimpfer
published
Daniel Hill
published 3.5
3.24
J Mark Barry
published 3.5
3.18
Ron Magnuson
published
3.10
James Lund
published 3.5
2.98
WM Scott Goodman
published
Robert Peiffer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Ward + David Hubbard51342% games−6.7% vs expected
James Lund + WM Scott Goodman2738% games−7.1% vs expected
Ron Magnuson + James Lund3350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Hubbard
58W–90L career · no lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.52
Michael Ward
53W–49L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
Robert Zimpfer
7W–4L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Daniel Hill
7W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
J Mark Barry
10W–12L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.24
Ron Magnuson
33W–44L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
James Lund
28W–75L career · type A · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
WM Scott Goodman
13W–32L career · no lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.98
Robert Peiffer
1W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.