Teams

NJ TEAL

2026 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.55 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-10vs GEN REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesKirstin Kraig / Kristin Walters vs Ursula Hamel / Sharon Naylor3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Stiebeling / Sara Leaver vs Tammy Roth / Jennifer Phillips7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBecky Bell / Terri Jenney vs Malou van Eijk / Janet Marks3-6, 3-6
2026-06-05vs LTC-D PINKWon 30
W#1 DoublesAngela Hale / Aimee Petri vs Linda Sexton / April Kobayashi6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTerri Jenney / Becky Bell vs Lauren Gardiner / Pamela Schmidt6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJolein Harro / Lisa Kellogg vs Martha McNamara / Margo Constable6-3, 6-3
2026-06-03vs MC NAVYLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristin Walters / Kirstin Kraig vs Kathleen Sumpter / Deborah Bautista3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPamela Johnstone / Marlene Swartz vs Lisa Cislo / Peggy Hofstra2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAimee Petri / Lisa Kellogg vs Mai Lee / Natalie Sanso4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-05-22vs GEN REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesPamela Johnstone / Marlene Swartz vs Tammy Roth / Jennifer Phillips6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJolein Harro / Angela Hale vs Ursula Hamel / Sharon Naylor2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAimee Petri / Lisa Kellogg vs Linda Wagner / Holly Harrison3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-20vs RHCC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesKirstin Kraig / Kristin Walters vs Valerie VanAlsburg / Kirstin McConnell6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPamela Johnstone / Marlene Swartz vs Sue Gallagher / Sandra Michel6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Stiebeling / Sara Leaver vs Nancy Progar / Terri Whitehair6-3, 6-4
2026-05-13vs LTC-D BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Stiebeling / Sara Leaver vs Angelique Manley / Bonita Thistle6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMarlene Swartz / Angela Hale vs Mary Johanson / Judith McKinney6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAimee Petri / Jolein Harro vs Liz Hafer / Chris Romer6-0, 6-0
2026-04-29vs MC NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesKirstin Kraig / Kristin Walters vs Deborah Bautista / Kathleen Sumpter5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPamela Johnstone / Aimee Petri vs Pamela Catalano / Karen Boisnard6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBecky Bell / Terri Jenney vs Tammy Chamberlain / Natalie Sanso6-3, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Kirstin Kraig
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
Jennifer Stiebeling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
Becky Bell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Pamela Johnstone
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.40
Marlene Swartz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Aimee Petri
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.21
Lisa Kellogg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Jolein Harro
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Angela Hale
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Sara Leaver
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.82
Terri Jenney
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Kristin Walters
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Johnstone + Marlene Swartz13559% games+2.9% vs expected
Jennifer Stiebeling + Sara Leaver10654% games−6.9% vs expected
Pamela Johnstone + Lisa Kellogg11265% gamesnot enough data
Becky Bell + Terri Jenney5256% gamesnot enough data
Kirstin Kraig + Kristin Walters314 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Walters + Lisa Kellogg404 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Kellogg + Sara Leaver314 matchesnot enough data
Kirstin Kraig + Jennifer Stiebeling213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kirstin Kraig
110W–102L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.81
4
Jennifer Stiebeling
175W–107L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Becky Bell
16W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Pamela Johnstone
171W–63L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Marlene Swartz
74W–55L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Aimee Petri
136W–73L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Lisa Kellogg
118W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Jolein Harro
48W–69L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Angela Hale
16W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Sara Leaver
110W–55L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Terri Jenney
110W–65L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Kristin Walters
40W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.