Teams

MC NAVY

2026 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-10vs LTC-D BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesPeggy Hofstra / Pamela Catalano vs Jill McKeon / Judith McKinney6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDeborah Bautista / Natalie Sanso vs Angelique Manley / Bonita Thistle6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAna Bland / Karen Boisnard vs Mary Johanson / Chris Romer6-3, 6-2
2026-06-03vs NJ TEALWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathleen Sumpter / Deborah Bautista vs Kristin Walters / Kirstin Kraig3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Cislo / Peggy Hofstra vs Pamela Johnstone / Marlene Swartz6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMai Lee / Natalie Sanso vs Aimee Petri / Lisa Kellogg4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-05-27vs RHCC REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesKathleen Sumpter / Lisa Cislo vs Valerie VanAlsburg / Mindi Pearse6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMai Lee / Natalie Sanso vs Kirstin McConnell / Julia McVey2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPeggy Hofstra / Ana Bland vs Jenifer Jones / Carla Grumann4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2026-05-20vs GEN REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesPeggy Hofstra / Lisa Cislo vs Tracy Adreon / Colleen Wilkinson6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDeborah Bautista / Ana Bland vs Tammy Roth / Malou van Eijk1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPamela Catalano / Natalie Sanso vs Linda Wagner / Holly Harrison6-2, 7-6
2026-05-13vs LTC-D PINKWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathleen Sumpter / Deborah Bautista vs Nancy Driver / Margo Constable6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTammy Chamberlain / Lisa Cislo vs Linda Sexton / Pamela Schmidt6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNatalie Sanso / Pamela Catalano vs Diana Beck / Lauren Gardiner6-0, 6-2
2026-05-06vs LTC-D BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesPeggy Hofstra / Lisa Cislo vs Angelique Manley / Bonita Thistle6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPamela Catalano / Karen Boisnard vs Jill McKeon / Chris Romer6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNatalie Sanso / Ana Bland vs Mary Johanson / Liz Hafer6-1, 6-3
2026-04-29vs NJ TEALLost 03
L#1 DoublesDeborah Bautista / Kathleen Sumpter vs Kirstin Kraig / Kristin Walters7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPamela Catalano / Karen Boisnard vs Pamela Johnstone / Aimee Petri1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTammy Chamberlain / Natalie Sanso vs Becky Bell / Terri Jenney3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Kathleen Sumpter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Deborah Bautista
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.41
Lisa Cislo
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.40
Peggy Hofstra
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.31
Tammy Chamberlain
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Karen Boisnard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Natalie Sanso
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.06
Ana Bland
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Pamela Catalano
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.05
Mai Lee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Shari Pew
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Bland + Natalie Sanso12951% games+5.3% vs expected
Ana Bland + Deborah Bautista3447% games+4.7% vs expected
Deborah Bautista + Kathleen Sumpter13464% games+1.7% vs expected
Karen Boisnard + Pamela Catalano3349% games−0.6% vs expected
Mai Lee + Natalie Sanso142046% games−4.6% vs expected
Ana Bland + Karen Boisnard2349% games−5.6% vs expected
Ana Bland + Pamela Catalano51244% games−9.3% vs expected
Natalie Sanso + Pamela Catalano4452% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kathleen Sumpter
48W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Deborah Bautista
70W–34L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
Lisa Cislo
20W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
Peggy Hofstra
29W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.40
3.5
Tammy Chamberlain
116W–64L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Karen Boisnard
79W–69L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Natalie Sanso
50W–57L career · 7 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Ana Bland
87W–109L career · 4 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
3.5
Pamela Catalano
63W–96L career · 5 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.06
3.5
Mai Lee
27W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
Shari Pew
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.