Teams

Burnstein/Nashville

2022 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Monica Nelson
published
3.57
Whitney Conyers
published
3.57
Julie Burnstein
published
3.55
Misty Holladay
published
3.50
Catherine Pietsch
published 3.5
3.45
Stephanie Baas
published
3.32
Natalie Goldsby
published
3.25
Annie Adler
published 3.5
3.20
Virginia Mazzoni
published
3.15
Lucy Duvall
published
2.94
2.90
Kim Bright
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Misty Holladay + Whitney Conyers3258% games+12.0% vs expected
Annie Adler + Julie Burnstein7360% games+9.2% vs expected
Julie Burnstein + Whitney Conyers8555% games+6.1% vs expected
Annie Adler + Misty Holladay3259% gamesnot enough data
Annie Adler + Virginia Mazzoni303 matchesnot enough data
Misty Holladay + Julie Burnstein123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Monica Nelson
37W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
3.97
Whitney Conyers
44W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%28%72%
3.57
Julie Burnstein
47W–29L career · no lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.57
Misty Holladay
32W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Catherine Pietsch
47W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
3.50
Stephanie Baas
18W–19L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.45
Natalie Goldsby
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Annie Adler
20W–9L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Virginia Mazzoni
14W–9L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Lucy Duvall
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Kelly Kirby-Piovarcy
40W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
2.94
Kim Bright
20W–29L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.