Teams

Northern: Sportime Schenectady

2022 18&Over Men · 5.0

7 players · average NTRP 4.83 / NORTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-07-31vs BellcourtWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Amico / Brian Bowman vs Matthew Vaughan / Derek Morrison6-3, 3-3
W#1 SinglesTristan Wise vs Stephane Legris7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesArjun Ramakrishnan / Dylan Davis vs Brian Byrne / Bailey McAtee6-2, 6-4
2022-07-31vs BellcourtLost 12
W#1 DoublesArjun Ramakrishnan / Brian Bowman vs Derek Morrison / Eric Ohern6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesTristan Wise vs Nicholas Grosso4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMichael Amico / Dylan Davis vs Stephane Legris / Bailey McAtee5-7, 6-7
2022-07-17vs BellcourtWon 20
W#1 DoublesPhilippe Ceas / Tristan Wise vs William Brahler / Matthew Vaughan6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBrian Bowman / Arjun Ramakrishnan vs Gregory Bellcourt / Brian Byrne6-4, 6-4
2022-07-10vs BellcourtWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Amico / Tristan Wise vs Gregory Bellcourt / Eric Ohern6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPhilippe Ceas / Brian Bowman vs William Brahler / Brian Byrne6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Northern: Sportime Schenectady318612129
2Bellcourt1341021155

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.43 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.72
Arjun Ramakrishnan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.45
Dylan Davis
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.12
Brian Bowman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
Michael Amico
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Philippe Ceas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roderick Williams
published
Tristan Wise
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Arjun Ramakrishnan + Brian Bowman6067% games+6.6% vs expected
Arjun Ramakrishnan + Michael Amico404 matchesnot enough data
Brian Bowman + Michael Amico404 matchesnot enough data
Dylan Davis + Brian Bowman123 matchesnot enough data
Dylan Davis + Michael Amico033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Arjun Ramakrishnan
38W–9L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
4.72
4.5
Dylan Davis
112W–50L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
4.45
5
Brian Bowman
41W–20L career · 4 lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
4.12
Michael Amico
50W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Philippe Ceas
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Roderick Williams
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tristan Wise
8W–3L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.