Teams

Bellcourt

2022 18&Over Men · 5.0

7 players · average NTRP 4.67 / NORTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-07-31vs Northern: Sportime SchenectadyLost 03
L#1 DoublesMatthew Vaughan / Derek Morrison vs Michael Amico / Brian Bowman3-6, 3-3
L#1 SinglesStephane Legris vs Tristan Wise6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBrian Byrne / Bailey McAtee vs Arjun Ramakrishnan / Dylan Davis2-6, 4-6
2022-07-31vs Northern: Sportime SchenectadyWon 21
L#1 DoublesDerek Morrison / Eric Ohern vs Arjun Ramakrishnan / Brian Bowman1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesNicholas Grosso vs Tristan Wise6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesStephane Legris / Bailey McAtee vs Michael Amico / Dylan Davis7-5, 7-6
2022-07-17vs Northern: Sportime SchenectadyLost 12
L#1 DoublesWilliam Brahler / Matthew Vaughan vs Philippe Ceas / Tristan Wise4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesNicholas Grosso vs Roderick Williams6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGregory Bellcourt / Brian Byrne vs Brian Bowman / Arjun Ramakrishnan4-6, 4-6
2022-07-10vs Northern: Sportime SchenectadyLost 12
L#1 DoublesGregory Bellcourt / Eric Ohern vs Michael Amico / Tristan Wise3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesStephane Legris vs Roderick Williams6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesWilliam Brahler / Brian Byrne vs Philippe Ceas / Brian Bowman4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Northern: Sportime Schenectady318612129
2Bellcourt1341021155

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.59 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brian Byrne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.66
William Brahler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.65
Matthew Vaughan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.47
Nicholas Grosso
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Eric Ohern
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Gregory Bellcourt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Stephane Legris
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Brian Byrne
3W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
William Brahler
35W–27L career · 2 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
4.66
Matthew Vaughan
34W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
4.65
Nicholas Grosso
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
4.47
4.5
Eric Ohern
14W–8L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Gregory Bellcourt
19W–16L career · type S · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephane Legris
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.