Teams

Florida/Roedig/55 & Over7.0W

2024 ORANGESEMINOLE Adult 55 & Over-Winter-Day · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-03-03vs Sanlando-Crane-Kick AceLost 12
W#1 DoublesHazel Cooke / Kelly Tilghman vs JoAnn Dierkes / Dorothy Harris6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKim Thomson / Melissa Farrell vs Kathi Thomas / Lori Tucker6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTina Bernhoft / Dana Laing vs Karen Crane / Amy Seelman7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-02-27vs Solivita-AdamsWon 20
W#2 DoublesJean Jenkins / Kelly Tilghman vs Sally Barkley / Leslie Sanders6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMichele Hunter / Tina Bernhoft vs Theresa Martinez / Deborah Dettmer6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2024-02-11vs Sanlando-Crane-Kick AceLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Farrell / Sherene Lewis vs Cynthia Rawlins / Dorothy Harris2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-01-21vs Sanlando-Crane-Kick AceWon 10
W#1 DoublesJamie Roedig / Dana Laing vs Julie Zalloum / Leticia Monge6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-01-13vs Solivita-AdamsWon 10
W#3 DoublesJamie Roedig / Carolynn Gilbert vs Darcy Cobb / Colleen Chandler6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Kelly Tilghman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.48
Hazel Cooke
published
3.27
Angela Tuckerman
published 3.5
3.27
Jean Jenkins
published
3.24
Jamie Roedig
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Michele Hunter
published
3.19
Lisa Miller
published
3.17
Tracey Are
published
3.15
Lisa Patten
published
3.07
Tina Bernhoft
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Carolynn Gilbert
published 3.5
2.99
Melissa Farrell
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sherene Lewis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Miller + Hazel Cooke7058% gamesnot enough data
Hazel Cooke + Tracey Are404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kelly Tilghman
117W–39L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
Hazel Cooke
12W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Angela Tuckerman
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.27
Jean Jenkins
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Jamie Roedig
78W–42L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.24
Michele Hunter
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Lisa Miller
21W–4L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
Tracey Are
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Lisa Patten
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
Tina Bernhoft
37W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.07
3.5
Carolynn Gilbert
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
Melissa Farrell
23W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.99
Sherene Lewis
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.